Positional Breakdowns of NFL Team Salary Caps
By: Michael GinnittiPublished: April 19, 2017
With mini camps and workouts kicking off and the 2017 NFL draft just days away, we'll take a moment to breakdown the current finanical structure for each NFL team based on positional groupings. Keep scrolling to view an in-depth visual & data-driven look at each team's current spending. NOTE: All figures shown here are based on players signed to the active roster, not dead cap or players who have been released with a June 1st designation. For a look at each team's complete salary cap, visit our NFL Cap Tracker.
2017 NFL Active Roster Spending by Position
The data table below breaks out each team into 9 positional groups. Click the tabs to adjust the figures accordingly, including:
- Total 2017 Cap $: the combined 2017 cap $ for each signed player within that positional group
- % Of Team Salary Cap: the percentage of cap $ that particular position group holds in comparison to the team's total salary cap
- Combined Average Salary: the combined average salaries for each signed player within that positional group
- Average Age: the average age of all signed players within that positional group
- Signed Players: the total number of signed players within that positional group
The following shows a snapshot look into how each NFL team is allocating its 2017 cap dollars positionally. The figures below represent the combined cap hits for all signed players within a position group. The number in parenthesis represents how that figure ranks among the rest of the teams for that particular position.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARI |
28790000 $28.8M (1) | 1939843 $1.9M (32) | 24671425 $24.7M (7) | 6035141 $6.0M (26) | 27395792 $27.4M (16) | 11911931 $11.9M (30) | 23748497 $23.7M (14) | 34957804 $35.0M (6) | 4280000 $4.3M (20) | 163730433 $163.7M (9) |
ATL |
27250000 $27.3M (3) | 4554417 $4.6M (27) | 28849651 $28.8M (1) | 5204190 $5.2M (28) | 26775664 $26.8M (18) | 27465058 $27.5M (12) | 9800731 $9.8M (31) | 24005983 $24.0M (20) | 6878334 $6.9M (10) | 160784028 $160.8M (13) |
BAL |
27090000 $27.1M (4) | 6484553 $6.5M (19) | 14495767 $14.5M (22) | 12421133 $12.4M (7) | 21318029 $21.3M (29) | 10150036 $10.2M (32) | 14999539 $15.0M (23) | 35291372 $35.3M (5) | 8440000 $8.4M (2) | 150690429 $150.7M (26) |
BUF |
10814182 $10.8M (21) | 13175228 $13.2M (2) | 12021379 $12.0M (29) | 10907500 $10.9M (8) | 38866495 $38.9M (4) | 31494704 $31.5M (8) | 18901584 $18.9M (16) | 13681368 $13.7M (32) | 4215000 $4.2M (22) | 154077440 $154.1M (21) |
CAR |
23875416 $23.9M (5) | 9726563 $9.7M (7) | 10619322 $10.6M (30) | 14761668 $14.8M (2) | 29796230 $29.8M (11) | 34866840 $34.9M (6) | 28577266 $28.6M (5) | 18496144 $18.5M (28) | 8205000 $8.2M (3) | 178924449 $178.9M (2) |
CHI |
16371250 $16.4M (19) | 3928756 $3.9M (30) | 21237945 $21.2M (10) | 9490833 $9.5M (11) | 29199028 $29.2M (12) | 14252293 $14.3M (28) | 33515794 $33.5M (4) | 28139392 $28.1M (16) | 2026327 $2.0M (32) | 158161618 $158.2M (16) |
CIN |
16975413 $17.0M (18) | 8696828 $8.7M (11) | 21977930 $22.0M (8) | 6250134 $6.3M (25) | 17476591 $17.5M (31) | 30987979 $31.0M (9) | 14213577 $14.2M (25) | 34918960 $34.9M (7) | 5410000 $5.4M (14) | 156907412 $156.9M (19) |
CLE |
17310246 $17.3M (17) | 5271023 $5.3M (24) | 14061327 $14.1M (23) | 5482732 $5.5M (27) | 49755880 $49.8M (1) | 12471719 $12.5M (29) | 24345030 $24.3M (12) | 24977841 $25.0M (18) | 5770000 $5.8M (12) | 159445798 $159.4M (14) |
DAL |
1715848 $1.7M (32) | 9809395 $9.8M (6) | 27403334 $27.4M (3) | 16895683 $16.9M (1) | 24579058 $24.6M (19) | 22695624 $22.7M (18) | 18439800 $18.4M (18) | 14856830 $14.9M (31) | 6970000 $7.0M (9) | 143365572 $143.4M (29) |
DEN |
2781899 $2.8M (30) | 6601925 $6.6M (18) | 26065858 $26.1M (4) | 6560201 $6.6M (23) | 23883428 $23.9M (22) | 18444978 $18.4M (25) | 34195121 $34.2M (3) | 39712581 $39.7M (2) | 4311002 $4.3M (19) | 162556993 $162.6M (10) |
DET |
22540000 $22.5M (8) | 5985187 $6.0M (21) | 20421250 $20.4M (14) | 6570788 $6.6M (22) | 23763849 $23.8M (24) | 29304392 $29.3M (11) | 12128615 $12.1M (29) | 32866625 $32.9M (10) | 8835089 $8.8M (1) | 162415795 $162.4M (11) |
GB |
21510908 $21.5M (11) | 3150235 $3.2M (31) | 28692429 $28.7M (2) | 8013504 $8.0M (21) | 22893124 $22.9M (26) | 20125160 $20.1M (21) | 26405404 $26.4M (9) | 19031400 $19.0M (27) | 5145000 $5.1M (16) | 154967164 $155.0M (20) |
HOU |
2390146 $2.4M (31) | 9686045 $9.7M (8) | 14039404 $14.0M (24) | 6554492 $6.6M (24) | 30466807 $30.5M (8) | 19051799 $19.1M (24) | 26111499 $26.1M (10) | 25301406 $25.3M (17) | 5032500 $5.0M (17) | 138634098 $138.6M (31) |
IND |
21940000 $21.9M (10) | 5424583 $5.4M (22) | 19601629 $19.6M (15) | 9235000 $9.2M (13) | 22619403 $22.6M (27) | 29650476 $29.7M (10) | 16282476 $16.3M (21) | 22322414 $22.3M (23) | 6330000 $6.3M (11) | 153405981 $153.4M (23) |
JAC |
10643053 $10.6M (22) | 9303266 $9.3M (10) | 13784328 $13.8M (25) | 8700000 $8.7M (16) | 27322812 $27.3M (17) | 35866635 $35.9M (5) | 20982509 $21.0M (15) | 31036144 $31.0M (13) | 3290000 $3.3M (27) | 160928747 $160.9M (12) |
KC |
18683750 $18.7M (16) | 6360416 $6.4M (20) | 17718188 $17.7M (19) | 8768963 $8.8M (15) | 29826309 $29.8M (10) | 27263566 $27.3M (13) | 41579864 $41.6M (1) | 21610996 $21.6M (24) | 7422000 $7.4M (6) | 179234052 $179.2M (1) |
LA |
7850957 $7.9M (26) | 8591515 $8.6M (13) | 25776967 $25.8M (5) | 1730111 $1.7M (32) | 29178813 $29.2M (13) | 20209250 $20.2M (20) | 37375949 $37.4M (2) | 33349131 $33.3M (9) | 5338773 $5.3M (15) | 169401466 $169.4M (6) |
LAC |
21160000 $21.2M (12) | 5402358 $5.4M (23) | 20596000 $20.6M (13) | 9272569 $9.3M (12) | 28614904 $28.6M (14) | 24373029 $24.4M (16) | 23787951 $23.8M (13) | 21565364 $21.6M (25) | 2250124 $2.3M (31) | 157022299 $157.0M (18) |
MIA |
23605000 $23.6M (6) | 4347518 $4.3M (28) | 9672176 $9.7M (31) | 10430000 $10.4M (10) | 23879713 $23.9M (23) | 40816372 $40.8M (2) | 13816459 $13.8M (26) | 23886849 $23.9M (21) | 2390334 $2.4M (30) | 152844421 $152.8M (24) |
MIN |
22703971 $22.7M (7) | 4940000 $4.9M (26) | 12160877 $12.2M (28) | 8313864 $8.3M (19) | 27548738 $27.5M (15) | 33233092 $33.2M (7) | 13699908 $13.7M (27) | 32147093 $32.1M (11) | 3390000 $3.4M (26) | 158137543 $158.1M (17) |
NE |
15883702 $15.9M (20) | 7961772 $8.0M (16) | 21406864 $21.4M (9) | 13382500 $13.4M (5) | 21681495 $21.7M (28) | 15031083 $15.0M (27) | 12475927 $12.5M (28) | 37185227 $37.2M (3) | 7085000 $7.1M (8) | 152093570 $152.1M (25) |
NO |
20155000 $20.2M (14) | 7826191 $7.8M (17) | 8093403 $8.1M (32) | 14270832 $14.3M (3) | 30203983 $30.2M (9) | 22473023 $22.5M (19) | 17824916 $17.8M (19) | 16181256 $16.2M (30) | 5705000 $5.7M (13) | 142733604 $142.7M (30) |
NYG |
22342500 $22.3M (9) | 8263555 $8.3M (14) | 14747018 $14.7M (21) | 3905713 $3.9M (29) | 23305795 $23.3M (25) | 39568094 $39.6M (4) | 16755359 $16.8M (20) | 34122652 $34.1M (8) | 3565000 $3.6M (24) | 166575686 $166.6M (7) |
NYJ |
8312583 $8.3M (25) | 11568333 $11.6M (3) | 15634888 $15.6M (20) | 3221582 $3.2M (31) | 31306387 $31.3M (7) | 40234396 $40.2M (3) | 14920585 $14.9M (24) | 30392497 $30.4M (14) | 3548948 $3.5M (25) | 159140199 $159.1M (15) |
OAK |
3044182 $3.0M (29) | 4087298 $4.1M (29) | 20867516 $20.9M (11) | 10904272 $10.9M (9) | 40529218 $40.5M (3) | 15894976 $15.9M (26) | 11070131 $11.1M (30) | 31417067 $31.4M (12) | 8195000 $8.2M (4) | 146009660 $146.0M (27) |
PHI |
7662804 $7.7M (27) | 11071144 $11.1M (4) | 25142651 $25.1M (6) | 8103333 $8.1M (20) | 45870830 $45.9M (2) | 24622103 $24.6M (15) | 24487748 $24.5M (11) | 20832964 $20.8M (26) | 3927500 $3.9M (23) | 171721077 $171.7M (3) |
PIT |
21090000 $21.1M (13) | 15975000 $16.0M (1) | 19573683 $19.6M (16) | 8877228 $8.9M (14) | 38485788 $38.5M (5) | 19808858 $19.8M (22) | 15204286 $15.2M (22) | 23264732 $23.3M (22) | 2930000 $2.9M (29) | 165209575 $165.2M (8) |
SEA |
19345000 $19.3M (15) | 8596712 $8.6M (12) | 19014558 $19.0M (17) | 13921220 $13.9M (4) | 15344233 $15.3M (32) | 27048928 $27.0M (14) | 18661413 $18.7M (17) | 44495369 $44.5M (1) | 4245000 $4.2M (21) | 170672433 $170.7M (5) |
SF |
7193750 $7.2M (28) | 7990638 $8.0M (15) | 18167862 $18.2M (18) | 8478783 $8.5M (18) | 24102575 $24.1M (21) | 19364521 $19.4M (23) | 26886092 $26.9M (8) | 16210262 $16.2M (29) | 4493550 $4.5M (18) | 132888033 $132.9M (32) |
TB |
9345985 $9.3M (24) | 11039729 $11.0M (5) | 20685478 $20.7M (12) | 3860000 $3.9M (30) | 24118391 $24.1M (20) | 43213886 $43.2M (1) | 9005756 $9.0M (32) | 24360235 $24.4M (19) | 7801038 $7.8M (5) | 153430498 $153.4M (22) |
TEN |
9893811 $9.9M (23) | 9468503 $9.5M (9) | 12295388 $12.3M (27) | 8528116 $8.5M (17) | 18482608 $18.5M (30) | 23637283 $23.6M (17) | 27423070 $27.4M (6) | 28599043 $28.6M (15) | 7284668 $7.3M (7) | 145612490 $145.6M (28) |
WAS |
28117933 $28.1M (2) | 5096241 $5.1M (25) | 13564484 $13.6M (26) | 12769167 $12.8M (6) | 33290843 $33.3M (6) | 11075000 $11.1M (31) | 26940161 $26.9M (7) | 36833477 $36.8M (4) | 3242500 $3.2M (28) | 170929806 $170.9M (4) |
| TOT: | $518.4M | $242.3M | $593.1M | $281.8M | $901.9M | $796.6M | $674.6M | $876.1M | $168.0M | $5,052.7M |
| AVG: | $16.2M | $7.6M | $18.5M | $8.8M | $28.2M | $24.9M | $21.1M | $27.4M | $5.2M | $157.9M |
The following shows a snapshot look at the percent of 2017 salary cap each NFL team is allocating positionally. The figures below represent the combined cap hits for all signed players within a position group, divided by the team's total salary cap allocations. The number in parenthesis represents how that figure ranks among the rest of the teams for that particular position.
| Team | QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI |
32 17.1% (1) | 1 1.2% (32) | 26 14.6% (7) | 7 3.6% (26) | 17 16.3% (16) | 3 7.1% (30) | 19 14.1% (14) | 27 20.8% (6) | 13 2.5% (20) |
| ATL |
30 16.2% (3) | 6 2.7% (27) | 32 17.1% (1) | 5 3.1% (28) | 15 15.9% (18) | 21 16.3% (12) | 2 5.8% (31) | 13 14.3% (20) | 23 4.1% (10) |
| BAL |
29 16.1% (4) | 14 3.8% (19) | 11 8.6% (22) | 26 7.4% (7) | 4 12.7% (29) | 1 6.0% (32) | 10 8.9% (23) | 28 21.0% (5) | 31 5.0% (2) |
| BUF |
12 6.4% (21) | 31 7.8% (2) | 4 7.1% (29) | 25 6.5% (8) | 29 23.1% (4) | 25 18.7% (8) | 17 11.2% (16) | 1 8.1% (32) | 11 2.5% (22) |
| CAR |
28 14.2% (5) | 26 5.8% (7) | 3 6.3% (30) | 31 8.8% (2) | 22 17.7% (11) | 27 20.7% (6) | 28 17.0% (5) | 5 11.0% (28) | 30 4.9% (3) |
| CHI |
14 9.7% (19) | 3 2.3% (30) | 23 12.6% (10) | 22 5.6% (11) | 21 17.3% (12) | 5 8.5% (28) | 29 19.9% (4) | 17 16.7% (16) | 1 1.2% (32) |
| CIN |
15 10.1% (18) | 22 5.2% (11) | 25 13.0% (8) | 8 3.7% (25) | 2 10.4% (31) | 24 18.4% (9) | 8 8.4% (25) | 26 20.7% (7) | 19 3.2% (14) |
| CLE |
16 10.3% (17) | 9 3.1% (24) | 10 8.3% (23) | 6 3.3% (27) | 32 29.5% (1) | 4 7.4% (29) | 21 14.5% (12) | 15 14.8% (18) | 21 3.4% (12) |
| DAL |
1 1.0% (32) | 27 5.8% (6) | 30 16.3% (3) | 32 10.0% (1) | 14 14.6% (19) | 15 13.5% (18) | 15 10.9% (18) | 2 8.8% (31) | 24 4.1% (9) |
| DEN |
3 1.7% (30) | 15 3.9% (18) | 29 15.5% (4) | 10 3.9% (23) | 11 14.2% (22) | 8 10.9% (25) | 30 20.3% (3) | 31 23.6% (2) | 14 2.6% (19) |
| DET |
25 13.4% (8) | 12 3.6% (21) | 19 12.1% (14) | 11 3.9% (22) | 9 14.1% (24) | 22 17.4% (11) | 4 7.2% (29) | 23 19.5% (10) | 32 5.2% (1) |
| GB |
22 12.8% (11) | 2 1.9% (31) | 31 17.0% (2) | 12 4.8% (21) | 7 13.6% (26) | 12 11.9% (21) | 24 15.7% (9) | 6 11.3% (27) | 17 3.1% (16) |
| HOU |
2 1.4% (31) | 25 5.8% (8) | 9 8.3% (24) | 9 3.9% (24) | 25 18.1% (8) | 9 11.3% (24) | 23 15.5% (10) | 16 15.0% (17) | 16 3.0% (17) |
| IND |
23 13.0% (10) | 11 3.2% (22) | 18 11.6% (15) | 20 5.5% (13) | 6 13.4% (27) | 23 17.6% (10) | 12 9.7% (21) | 10 13.3% (23) | 22 3.8% (11) |
| JAC |
11 6.3% (22) | 23 5.5% (10) | 8 8.2% (25) | 17 5.2% (16) | 16 16.2% (17) | 28 21.3% (5) | 18 12.5% (15) | 20 18.4% (13) | 6 2.0% (27) |
| KC |
17 11.1% (16) | 13 3.8% (20) | 14 10.5% (19) | 18 5.2% (15) | 23 17.7% (10) | 20 16.2% (13) | 32 24.7% (1) | 9 12.8% (24) | 27 4.4% (6) |
| LA |
7 4.7% (26) | 20 5.1% (13) | 28 15.3% (5) | 1 1.0% (32) | 20 17.3% (13) | 13 12.0% (20) | 31 22.2% (2) | 24 19.8% (9) | 18 3.2% (15) |
| LAC |
21 12.6% (12) | 10 3.2% (23) | 20 12.2% (13) | 21 5.5% (12) | 19 17.0% (14) | 17 14.5% (16) | 20 14.1% (13) | 8 12.8% (25) | 2 1.3% (31) |
| MIA |
27 14.0% (6) | 5 2.6% (28) | 2 5.7% (31) | 23 6.2% (10) | 10 14.2% (23) | 31 24.2% (2) | 7 8.2% (26) | 12 14.2% (21) | 3 1.4% (30) |
| MIN |
26 13.5% (7) | 7 2.9% (26) | 5 7.2% (28) | 14 4.9% (19) | 18 16.4% (15) | 26 19.7% (7) | 6 8.1% (27) | 22 19.1% (11) | 7 2.0% (26) |
| NE |
13 9.4% (20) | 17 4.7% (16) | 24 12.7% (9) | 28 7.9% (5) | 5 12.9% (28) | 6 8.9% (27) | 5 7.4% (28) | 30 22.1% (3) | 25 4.2% (8) |
| NO |
19 12.0% (14) | 16 4.6% (17) | 1 4.8% (32) | 30 8.5% (3) | 24 17.9% (9) | 14 13.3% (19) | 14 10.6% (19) | 3 9.6% (30) | 20 3.4% (13) |
| NYG |
24 13.3% (9) | 19 4.9% (14) | 12 8.8% (21) | 4 2.3% (29) | 8 13.8% (25) | 29 23.5% (4) | 13 9.9% (20) | 25 20.3% (8) | 9 2.1% (24) |
| NYJ |
8 4.9% (25) | 30 6.9% (3) | 13 9.3% (20) | 2 1.9% (31) | 26 18.6% (7) | 30 23.9% (3) | 9 8.9% (24) | 19 18.0% (14) | 8 2.1% (25) |
| OAK |
4 1.8% (29) | 4 2.4% (29) | 22 12.4% (11) | 24 6.5% (9) | 30 24.1% (3) | 7 9.4% (26) | 3 6.6% (30) | 21 18.7% (12) | 29 4.9% (4) |
| PHI |
6 4.5% (27) | 29 6.6% (4) | 27 14.9% (6) | 13 4.8% (20) | 31 27.2% (2) | 18 14.6% (15) | 22 14.5% (11) | 7 12.4% (26) | 10 2.3% (23) |
| PIT |
20 12.5% (13) | 32 9.5% (1) | 17 11.6% (16) | 19 5.3% (14) | 28 22.8% (5) | 11 11.8% (22) | 11 9.0% (22) | 11 13.8% (22) | 4 1.7% (29) |
| SEA |
18 11.5% (15) | 21 5.1% (12) | 16 11.3% (17) | 29 8.3% (4) | 1 9.1% (32) | 19 16.1% (14) | 16 11.1% (17) | 32 26.4% (1) | 12 2.5% (21) |
| SF |
5 4.3% (28) | 18 4.7% (15) | 15 10.8% (18) | 15 5.0% (18) | 12 14.3% (21) | 10 11.5% (23) | 25 16.0% (8) | 4 9.6% (29) | 15 2.7% (18) |
| TB |
9 5.5% (24) | 28 6.6% (5) | 21 12.3% (12) | 3 2.3% (30) | 13 14.3% (20) | 32 25.7% (1) | 1 5.3% (32) | 14 14.5% (19) | 28 4.6% (5) |
| TEN |
10 5.9% (23) | 24 5.6% (9) | 6 7.3% (27) | 16 5.1% (17) | 3 11.0% (30) | 16 14.0% (17) | 27 16.3% (6) | 18 17.0% (15) | 26 4.3% (7) |
| WAS |
31 16.7% (2) | 8 3.0% (25) | 7 8.1% (26) | 27 7.6% (6) | 27 19.8% (6) | 2 6.6% (31) | 26 16.0% (7) | 29 21.9% (4) | 5 1.9% (28) |
| AVG: | 9.6% | 4.5% | 11.0% | 5.2% | 16.7% | 14.8% | 12.5% | 16.3% | 3.1% |
The following shows a snapshot look at the combined average salaries for all signed players within a position group. The number in parenthesis represents how that figure ranks among the rest of the teams for that particular position.
| Team | QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI |
28170000 $28.2M (1) | 1749843 $1.7M (32) | 19212175 $19.2M (15) | 8995825 $9.0M (18) | 22855745 $22.9M (25) | 12011981 $12.0M (31) | 34578441 $34.6M (4) | 43740674 $43.7M (2) | 4730000 $4.7M (19) | 176044684 $176.0M (7) |
| ATL |
25250000 $25.3M (5) | 3250999 $3.3M (30) | 28375860 $28.4M (2) | 6859190 $6.9M (23) | 31075470 $31.1M (13) | 26835564 $26.8M (12) | 9282792 $9.3M (32) | 33322537 $33.3M (9) | 6725583 $6.7M (8) | 170977945 $171.0M (8) |
| BAL |
24673333 $24.7M (6) | 7659945 $7.7M (19) | 12423707 $12.4M (27) | 12804027 $12.8M (7) | 20547776 $20.5M (28) | 14605109 $14.6M (28) | 12791032 $12.8M (29) | 40325205 $40.3M (3) | 8570000 $8.6M (2) | 154400134 $154.4M (23) |
| BUF |
16440848 $16.4M (21) | 12925288 $12.9M (3) | 11323801 $11.3M (29) | 9385000 $9.4M (17) | 34351622 $34.4M (8) | 30636087 $30.6M (9) | 16601781 $16.6M (21) | 17022512 $17.0M (29) | 4760000 $4.8M (18) | 153446880 $153.4M (25) |
| CAR |
24505000 $24.5M (8) | 11641594 $11.6M (5) | 10959618 $11.0M (30) | 11183333 $11.2M (9) | 37778074 $37.8M (5) | 35965254 $36.0M (5) | 28679058 $28.7M (8) | 21739331 $21.7M (24) | 8095000 $8.1M (3) | 190546232 $190.5M (3) |
| CHI |
17465000 $17.5M (19) | 3908757 $3.9M (29) | 21642762 $21.6M (10) | 10505000 $10.5M (13) | 30182500 $30.2M (14) | 12080059 $12.1M (30) | 37669495 $37.7M (1) | 28401001 $28.4M (18) | 2041327 $2.0M (32) | 163895901 $163.9M (14) |
| CIN |
17213548 $17.2M (20) | 10265094 $10.3M (8) | 23281725 $23.3M (7) | 3437510 $3.4M (30) | 16995837 $17.0M (31) | 31546692 $31.5M (8) | 14438327 $14.4M (25) | 37235478 $37.2M (6) | 5037500 $5.0M (16) | 159451685 $159.5M (18) |
| CLE |
19342271 $19.3M (16) | 5197384 $5.2M (25) | 17090677 $17.1M (19) | 5890232 $5.9M (26) | 48751991 $48.8M (1) | 10519864 $10.5M (32) | 22602820 $22.6M (13) | 26422842 $26.4M (20) | 5016667 $5.0M (17) | 160834726 $160.8M (16) |
| DAL |
1965848 $2.0M (32) | 10274110 $10.3M (7) | 25349833 $25.3M (3) | 11783684 $11.8M (8) | 32640122 $32.6M (10) | 21163678 $21.2M (21) | 17778859 $17.8M (20) | 14685394 $14.7M (30) | 5714286 $5.7M (12) | 141355789 $141.4M (30) |
| DEN |
2952270 $3.0M (29) | 8306948 $8.3M (17) | 29152163 $29.2M (1) | 5991465 $6.0M (25) | 25701479 $25.7M (21) | 20144476 $20.1M (23) | 35991207 $36.0M (2) | 34854912 $34.9M (7) | 4356002 $4.4M (23) | 167450899 $167.5M (10) |
| DET |
18161667 $18.2M (18) | 7410754 $7.4M (20) | 17935000 $17.9M (18) | 5850620 $5.9M (27) | 29920985 $29.9M (15) | 21530469 $21.5M (19) | 11510283 $11.5M (31) | 29667125 $29.7M (15) | 8090158 $8.1M (4) | 150077036 $150.1M (26) |
| GB |
23120908 $23.1M (10) | 3123846 $3.1M (31) | 23845493 $23.8M (5) | 10155254 $10.2M (15) | 25713858 $25.7M (20) | 20454593 $20.5M (22) | 30518600 $30.5M (6) | 17179156 $17.2M (28) | 5705000 $5.7M (13) | 159816660 $159.8M (17) |
| HOU |
2630146 $2.6M (31) | 9371069 $9.4M (11) | 8293181 $8.3M (32) | 4925446 $4.9M (28) | 29424310 $29.4M (17) | 21224372 $21.2M (20) | 24254531 $24.3M (10) | 22856509 $22.9M (22) | 5176667 $5.2M (14) | 128156207 $128.2M (32) |
| IND |
26929000 $26.9M (3) | 5893333 $5.9M (23) | 21095984 $21.1M (12) | 7635000 $7.6M (22) | 21008008 $21.0M (27) | 29720587 $29.7M (10) | 14879977 $14.9M (24) | 21727126 $21.7M (25) | 6790000 $6.8M (7) | 155679015 $155.7M (21) |
| JAC |
9279772 $9.3M (23) | 9545137 $9.5M (10) | 16219678 $16.2M (21) | 8280000 $8.3M (20) | 26329062 $26.3M (19) | 39082699 $39.1M (4) | 18088936 $18.1M (19) | 37849851 $37.8M (5) | 3628542 $3.6M (26) | 168303651 $168.3M (9) |
| KC |
18427500 $18.4M (17) | 7918385 $7.9M (18) | 16220046 $16.2M (20) | 13481714 $13.5M (6) | 36480777 $36.5M (6) | 26443685 $26.4M (13) | 35489655 $35.5M (3) | 30181201 $30.2M (13) | 6437000 $6.4M (11) | 191079911 $191.1M (2) |
| LA |
8412142 $8.4M (26) | 8430822 $8.4M (16) | 21294852 $21.3M (11) | 1865111 $1.9M (32) | 29525557 $29.5M (16) | 19656458 $19.7M (24) | 32357848 $32.4M (5) | 30443811 $30.4M (12) | 6621250 $6.6M (9) | 158607825 $158.6M (20) |
| LAC |
22357500 $22.4M (12) | 5204888 $5.2M (24) | 22546000 $22.5M (8) | 9640077 $9.6M (16) | 34510779 $34.5M (7) | 26220788 $26.2M (15) | 23212821 $23.2M (12) | 20865958 $20.9M (26) | 2252623 $2.3M (31) | 166811410 $166.8M (12) |
| MIA |
22225000 $22.2M (14) | 4437518 $4.4M (28) | 13478056 $13.5M (26) | 11050000 $11.1M (10) | 24094846 $24.1M (22) | 44242215 $44.2M (3) | 21102833 $21.1M (16) | 34133186 $34.1M (8) | 2585333 $2.6M (30) | 177348987 $177.3M (5) |
| MIN |
22240709 $22.2M (13) | 6831250 $6.8M (22) | 13977173 $14.0M (24) | 8858864 $8.9M (19) | 31759239 $31.8M (12) | 25576100 $25.6M (16) | 12745104 $12.7M (30) | 29022252 $29.0M (16) | 3346471 $3.3M (27) | 154357162 $154.4M (24) |
| NE |
22223683 $22.2M (15) | 14195052 $14.2M (2) | 17975361 $18.0M (17) | 18205000 $18.2M (1) | 23679327 $23.7M (24) | 17064852 $17.1M (26) | 16282280 $16.3M (22) | 39512862 $39.5M (4) | 6953333 $7.0M (6) | 176091698 $176.1M (6) |
| NO |
25735000 $25.7M (4) | 7126226 $7.1M (21) | 8681410 $8.7M (31) | 13946667 $13.9M (5) | 38645041 $38.6M (3) | 26244593 $26.2M (14) | 20587841 $20.6M (17) | 13565466 $13.6M (31) | 4697500 $4.7M (20) | 159229710 $159.2M (19) |
| NYG |
23760000 $23.8M (9) | 8529804 $8.5M (15) | 15403860 $15.4M (22) | 6200714 $6.2M (24) | 17412473 $17.4M (29) | 47283028 $47.3M (1) | 14061692 $14.1M (26) | 30132919 $30.1M (14) | 3817500 $3.8M (25) | 166601990 $166.6M (13) |
| NYJ |
7873500 $7.9M (28) | 9742357 $9.7M (9) | 14124368 $14.1M (23) | 3398730 $3.4M (31) | 32195138 $32.2M (11) | 33164217 $33.2M (7) | 16177564 $16.2M (23) | 26655652 $26.7M (19) | 4013949 $4.0M (24) | 147345451 $147.3M (27) |
| OAK |
2882923 $2.9M (30) | 4643994 $4.6M (27) | 20457446 $20.5M (14) | 10978030 $11.0M (11) | 37827572 $37.8M (4) | 13360821 $13.4M (29) | 18980132 $19.0M (18) | 28497666 $28.5M (17) | 8695000 $8.7M (1) | 146323556 $146.3M (28) |
| PHI |
12169085 $12.2M (22) | 10402836 $10.4M (6) | 25308560 $25.3M (4) | 13961666 $14.0M (4) | 47403662 $47.4M (2) | 33235450 $33.2M (6) | 22543078 $22.5M (14) | 25299141 $25.3M (21) | 4361666 $4.4M (22) | 194685120 $194.7M (1) |
| PIT |
24636279 $24.6M (7) | 16135025 $16.1M (1) | 23548685 $23.5M (6) | 7652228 $7.7M (21) | 33659947 $33.7M (9) | 19391496 $19.4M (25) | 13166470 $13.2M (28) | 20206748 $20.2M (27) | 3270000 $3.3M (28) | 161666853 $161.7M (15) |
| SEA |
22445000 $22.4M (11) | 9249236 $9.2M (13) | 20977897 $21.0M (13) | 14034220 $14.0M (3) | 16028876 $16.0M (32) | 27596484 $27.6M (11) | 21901413 $21.9M (15) | 45905502 $45.9M (1) | 5145000 $5.1M (15) | 183283604 $183.3M (4) |
| SF |
8000000 $8.0M (27) | 9309640 $9.3M (12) | 21823696 $21.8M (9) | 10796283 $10.8M (12) | 22794455 $22.8M (26) | 21696175 $21.7M (18) | 30362426 $30.4M (7) | 11857682 $11.9M (32) | 4658550 $4.7M (21) | 141298882 $141.3M (31) |
| TB |
8769819 $8.8M (25) | 12275879 $12.3M (4) | 18242043 $18.2M (16) | 3805000 $3.8M (29) | 23795200 $23.8M (23) | 44521075 $44.5M (2) | 13175758 $13.2M (27) | 22357455 $22.4M (23) | 7668142 $7.7M (5) | 154610322 $154.6M (22) |
| TEN |
9158494 $9.2M (24) | 8953937 $9.0M (14) | 12278721 $12.3M (28) | 10355748 $10.4M (14) | 17410852 $17.4M (30) | 23928721 $23.9M (17) | 23425655 $23.4M (11) | 31615619 $31.6M (10) | 6550000 $6.6M (10) | 143677721 $143.7M (29) |
| WAS |
27562934 $27.6M (2) | 5120242 $5.1M (26) | 13802887 $13.8M (25) | 17855000 $17.9M (2) | 28228422 $28.2M (18) | 14700000 $14.7M (27) | 25572183 $25.6M (9) | 31072598 $31.1M (11) | 3217000 $3.2M (29) | 167131266 $167.1M (11) |
| TOT: | $547.0M | $259.0M | $586.3M | $299.8M | $928.7M | $811.8M | $690.8M | $898.4M | $168.7M | $5,190.6M |
| AVG: | $17.1M | $8.1M | $18.3M | $9.4M | $29.0M | $25.4M | $21.6M | $28.1M | $5.3M | $162.2M |
The following shows a snapshot look at how many players each NFL team currently has signed within each particular position group.
| Team | QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI |
3 3 | 3 3 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 11 11 | 9 9 | 11 11 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 69 69 |
| ATL |
2 2 | 5 5 | 9 9 | 6 6 | 10 10 | 10 10 | 6 6 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 64 64 |
| BAL |
3 3 | 7 7 | 7 7 | 6 6 | 11 11 | 7 7 | 9 9 | 13 13 | 3 3 | 66 66 |
| BUF |
4 4 | 6 6 | 9 9 | 4 4 | 13 13 | 10 10 | 8 8 | 13 13 | 3 3 | 70 70 |
| CAR |
4 4 | 6 6 | 9 9 | 5 5 | 17 17 | 10 10 | 8 8 | 17 17 | 4 4 | 80 80 |
| CHI |
3 3 | 6 6 | 12 12 | 5 5 | 11 11 | 9 9 | 11 11 | 18 18 | 3 3 | 78 78 |
| CIN |
3 3 | 5 5 | 8 8 | 3 3 | 10 10 | 14 14 | 6 6 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 65 65 |
| CLE |
3 3 | 5 5 | 11 11 | 4 4 | 15 15 | 9 9 | 10 10 | 13 13 | 4 4 | 74 74 |
| DAL |
3 3 | 5 5 | 9 9 | 5 5 | 13 13 | 11 11 | 11 11 | 10 10 | 3 3 | 70 70 |
| DEN |
2 2 | 7 7 | 9 9 | 7 7 | 12 12 | 10 10 | 10 10 | 9 9 | 4 4 | 70 70 |
| DET |
2 2 | 6 6 | 8 8 | 5 5 | 12 12 | 9 9 | 9 9 | 14 14 | 4 4 | 69 69 |
| GB |
3 3 | 5 5 | 9 9 | 4 4 | 10 10 | 8 8 | 9 9 | 11 11 | 4 4 | 63 63 |
| HOU |
2 2 | 6 6 | 8 8 | 4 4 | 11 11 | 9 9 | 8 8 | 11 11 | 5 5 | 64 64 |
| IND |
3 3 | 3 3 | 9 9 | 3 3 | 13 13 | 10 10 | 10 10 | 17 17 | 5 5 | 73 73 |
| JAC |
3 3 | 6 6 | 10 10 | 7 7 | 15 15 | 11 11 | 10 10 | 12 12 | 3 3 | 77 77 |
| KC |
3 3 | 6 6 | 7 7 | 5 5 | 13 13 | 13 13 | 11 11 | 13 13 | 3 3 | 74 74 |
| LA |
3 3 | 6 6 | 9 9 | 3 3 | 14 14 | 8 8 | 11 11 | 16 16 | 4 4 | 74 74 |
| LAC |
3 3 | 6 6 | 8 8 | 6 6 | 13 13 | 9 9 | 12 12 | 12 12 | 3 3 | 72 72 |
| MIA |
4 4 | 5 5 | 6 6 | 5 5 | 12 12 | 10 10 | 9 9 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 67 67 |
| MIN |
4 4 | 4 4 | 9 9 | 4 4 | 13 13 | 10 10 | 7 7 | 13 13 | 5 5 | 69 69 |
| NE |
3 3 | 7 7 | 8 8 | 5 5 | 11 11 | 10 10 | 6 6 | 12 12 | 3 3 | 65 65 |
| NO |
3 3 | 5 5 | 9 9 | 7 7 | 9 9 | 11 11 | 10 10 | 17 17 | 3 3 | 74 74 |
| NYG |
4 4 | 7 7 | 8 8 | 4 4 | 12 12 | 10 10 | 11 11 | 12 12 | 3 3 | 71 71 |
| NYJ |
3 3 | 6 6 | 11 11 | 5 5 | 12 12 | 13 13 | 11 11 | 14 14 | 6 6 | 81 81 |
| OAK |
3 3 | 4 4 | 7 7 | 6 6 | 11 11 | 11 11 | 8 8 | 10 10 | 4 4 | 64 64 |
| PHI |
3 3 | 6 6 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 16 16 | 10 10 | 9 9 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 76 76 |
| PIT |
3 3 | 8 8 | 11 11 | 5 5 | 12 12 | 13 13 | 9 9 | 15 15 | 5 5 | 81 81 |
| SEA |
2 2 | 11 11 | 10 10 | 6 6 | 11 11 | 13 13 | 7 7 | 13 13 | 5 5 | 78 78 |
| SF |
2 2 | 6 6 | 12 12 | 4 4 | 9 9 | 11 11 | 11 11 | 13 13 | 5 5 | 73 73 |
| TB |
3 3 | 8 8 | 8 8 | 5 5 | 14 14 | 12 12 | 6 6 | 11 11 | 5 5 | 72 72 |
| TEN |
3 3 | 4 4 | 7 7 | 5 5 | 11 11 | 11 11 | 9 9 | 13 13 | 3 3 | 66 66 |
| WAS |
3 3 | 5 5 | 11 11 | 5 5 | 11 11 | 8 8 | 16 16 | 13 13 | 3 3 | 75 75 |
| TOT: | 95 | 185 | 292 | 156 | 388 | 329 | 299 | 415 | 125 | 2,284 |
| AVG: | 3.0 | 5.8 | 9.1 | 4.9 | 12.1 | 10.3 | 9.3 | 13.0 | 3.9 | 71.4 |
The following shows a snapshot look at the average age for all currently signed players within a positional group on each NFL team. The number in parenthesis represents how that figure ranks among the rest of the teams for that particular position.
| Team | QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARI |
31 32.0 (2) | 28 24.3 (5) | 30 26.3 (3) | 17 25.8 (16) | 9 25.2 (24) | 24 26.1 (9) | 25 26.5 (8) | 28 26.1 (5) | 22 29.3 (11) | 31 26.4 (2) |
| ATL |
32 33.0 (1) | 2 14.8 (31) | 32 26.6 (1) | 2 23.7 (31) | 30 26.7 (3) | 20 25.8 (13) | 12 25.3 (21) | 10 25.1 (23) | 28 30.3 (5) | 27 26.1 (6) |
| BAL |
23 28.7 (10) | 30 25.4 (3) | 24 25.6 (9) | 28 27.2 (5) | 5 25.0 (28) | 6 24.9 (27) | 20 25.9 (13) | 32 27.2 (1) | 29 30.3 (4) | 29 26.3 (4) |
| BUF |
8 26.0 (25) | 3 17.0 (30) | 20 25.2 (13) | 12 25.5 (21) | 32 26.8 (1) | 17 25.7 (16) | 19 25.9 (14) | 12 25.2 (21) | 9 26.7 (24) | 18 25.9 (15) |
| CAR |
24 28.8 (9) | 24 22.0 (9) | 14 24.9 (19) | 31 27.8 (2) | 22 26.1 (11) | 31 26.8 (2) | 32 27.4 (1) | 26 26.1 (7) | 26 29.8 (7) | 32 26.7 (1) |
| CHI |
18 27.3 (15) | 27 24.3 (6) | 23 25.4 (10) | 20 26.4 (13) | 20 26.1 (13) | 23 26.1 (10) | 27 26.8 (6) | 15 25.4 (18) | 21 28.7 (12) | 20 26.0 (13) |
| CIN |
9 26.0 (24) | 15 20.6 (18) | 17 25.0 (16) | 5 24.7 (28) | 12 25.7 (21) | 28 26.4 (5) | 15 25.5 (18) | 17 25.4 (16) | 19 28.5 (14) | 16 25.8 (17) |
| CLE |
3 24.3 (30) | 7 18.8 (26) | 5 24.5 (28) | 13 25.5 (20) | 17 25.9 (16) | 4 24.8 (29) | 2 24.7 (31) | 1 24.2 (32) | 13 27.3 (20) | 1 24.9 (32) |
| DAL |
4 25.0 (29) | 14 20.6 (19) | 28 26.0 (5) | 19 26.4 (14) | 14 25.8 (19) | 3 24.7 (30) | 9 25.1 (24) | 11 25.1 (22) | 30 30.7 (3) | 12 25.6 (21) |
| DEN |
2 24.0 (31) | 18 21.1 (15) | 16 25.0 (17) | 4 24.6 (29) | 16 25.8 (17) | 18 25.7 (15) | 6 24.9 (27) | 25 26.0 (8) | 1 24.3 (32) | 5 25.2 (28) |
| DET |
12 26.5 (21) | 11 20.2 (22) | 26 25.8 (7) | 8 25.2 (25) | 7 25.2 (26) | 25 26.2 (8) | 4 24.8 (29) | 9 25.1 (24) | 24 29.5 (9) | 9 25.5 (24) |
| GB |
11 26.3 (22) | 1 14.4 (32) | 11 24.8 (22) | 27 27.0 (6) | 4 24.8 (29) | 8 25.0 (25) | 16 25.6 (17) | 4 24.7 (29) | 6 26.5 (27) | 4 25.2 (29) |
| HOU |
28 29.5 (5) | 13 20.3 (20) | 1 21.0 (32) | 16 25.8 (17) | 27 26.4 (6) | 1 23.9 (32) | 14 25.5 (19) | 22 25.8 (11) | 27 30.2 (6) | 7 25.3 (26) |
| IND |
14 26.7 (19) | 32 27.7 (1) | 7 24.6 (26) | 18 26.3 (15) | 3 24.5 (30) | 27 26.4 (6) | 5 24.9 (28) | 8 25.0 (25) | 25 29.6 (8) | 10 25.6 (23) |
| JAC |
13 26.7 (20) | 19 21.3 (14) | 21 25.3 (12) | 15 25.7 (18) | 19 26.0 (14) | 12 25.3 (21) | 18 25.8 (15) | 7 25.0 (26) | 5 26.3 (28) | 11 25.6 (22) |
| KC |
17 27.0 (16) | 4 17.2 (29) | 3 24.1 (30) | 11 25.4 (22) | 11 25.7 (22) | 16 25.7 (17) | 30 27.1 (3) | 6 25.0 (27) | 20 28.7 (13) | 15 25.8 (18) |
| LA |
1 24.0 (32) | 12 20.3 (21) | 6 24.6 (27) | 1 23.7 (32) | 18 25.9 (15) | 7 25.0 (26) | 8 25.1 (25) | 3 24.7 (30) | 15 27.5 (18) | 3 25.1 (30) |
| LAC |
29 30.7 (4) | 16 20.7 (17) | 22 25.4 (11) | 32 28.5 (1) | 26 26.2 (7) | 22 26.1 (11) | 3 24.8 (30) | 23 25.8 (10) | 8 26.7 (25) | 26 26.1 (7) |
| MIA |
19 27.8 (14) | 25 24.0 (8) | 2 24.0 (31) | 29 27.2 (4) | 28 26.5 (5) | 32 27.4 (1) | 28 26.9 (5) | 20 25.6 (13) | 16 27.8 (17) | 30 26.3 (3) |
| MIN |
15 26.8 (18) | 26 24.3 (7) | 8 24.7 (25) | 10 25.3 (23) | 23 26.2 (10) | 30 26.8 (3) | 7 25.0 (26) | 29 26.4 (4) | 4 26.2 (29) | 17 25.9 (16) |
| NE |
25 29.3 (8) | 5 18.6 (28) | 31 26.5 (2) | 26 27.0 (7) | 6 25.1 (27) | 21 25.9 (12) | 11 25.3 (22) | 16 25.4 (17) | 18 28.3 (15) | 25 26.1 (8) |
| NO |
30 31.0 (3) | 17 21.0 (16) | 10 24.8 (23) | 21 26.4 (12) | 21 26.1 (12) | 14 25.5 (19) | 26 26.7 (7) | 18 25.5 (15) | 3 25.7 (30) | 28 26.1 (5) |
| NYG |
27 29.5 (6) | 31 25.7 (2) | 27 26.0 (6) | 9 25.3 (24) | 10 25.6 (23) | 10 25.2 (23) | 22 26.0 (11) | 5 24.8 (28) | 10 26.7 (23) | 14 25.8 (19) |
| NYJ |
20 28.0 (13) | 21 21.5 (12) | 15 25.0 (18) | 3 23.8 (30) | 15 25.8 (18) | 9 25.2 (24) | 13 25.4 (20) | 19 25.5 (14) | 2 25.7 (31) | 8 25.4 (25) |
| OAK |
7 25.7 (26) | 6 18.8 (27) | 9 24.7 (24) | 24 26.7 (9) | 25 26.2 (8) | 2 24.4 (31) | 17 25.6 (16) | 24 26.0 (9) | 32 32.0 (1) | 21 26.0 (12) |
| PHI |
10 26.3 (23) | 22 21.8 (11) | 4 24.2 (29) | 22 26.5 (11) | 31 26.8 (2) | 13 25.3 (20) | 10 25.2 (23) | 30 26.5 (3) | 31 30.8 (2) | 23 26.0 (10) |
| PIT |
26 29.3 (7) | 20 21.4 (13) | 18 25.1 (15) | 6 24.8 (27) | 1 23.8 (32) | 5 24.8 (28) | 31 27.1 (2) | 14 25.3 (19) | 7 26.6 (26) | 6 25.3 (27) |
| SEA |
6 25.5 (27) | 9 19.0 (24) | 12 24.8 (21) | 14 25.7 (19) | 2 24.1 (31) | 19 25.8 (14) | 23 26.1 (10) | 31 26.7 (2) | 11 26.8 (22) | 2 25.0 (31) |
| SF |
21 28.5 (12) | 23 22.0 (10) | 25 25.8 (8) | 30 27.3 (3) | 29 26.6 (4) | 11 25.3 (22) | 24 26.5 (9) | 2 24.6 (31) | 12 27.0 (21) | 19 26.0 (14) |
| TB |
5 25.3 (28) | 8 18.9 (25) | 13 24.9 (20) | 7 25.0 (26) | 13 25.7 (20) | 29 26.8 (4) | 1 24.3 (32) | 21 25.7 (12) | 17 28.0 (16) | 13 25.7 (20) |
| TEN |
22 28.7 (11) | 10 19.0 (23) | 29 26.1 (4) | 23 26.6 (10) | 8 25.2 (25) | 15 25.5 (18) | 29 27.0 (4) | 13 25.2 (20) | 23 29.3 (10) | 24 26.1 (9) |
| WAS |
16 27.0 (17) | 29 24.4 (4) | 19 25.2 (14) | 25 27.0 (8) | 24 26.2 (9) | 26 26.3 (7) | 21 25.9 (12) | 27 26.1 (6) | 14 27.3 (19) | 22 26.0 (11) |
| TOT: | 2,615 | 3,856 | 7,321 | 4,049 | 9,993 | 8,440 | 7,713 | 10,578 | 3,505 | 58,841 |
| AVG: | 27.5 | 20.8 | 25.1 | 26.0 | 25.8 | 25.7 | 25.8 | 25.5 | 28.0 | 25.8 |
2017 Team by Team Active Roster Spending by Position
This section highlights each team's current spending allocations across the 9 major position groups. We've broken numbers our by Combined Cap Hits, % of the Active Roster Cap, Combined Average Salary, and the Average Age respectively. Additionally we've included a bar chart that shows how a team's cap spending compares to that of the league average positionally.
Arizona Cardinals
Top 51 Cap Space: $16,626,224 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: QB, LB, G, CB
It should come as no surprise, but the Cardinals currently hold the 2nd oldest roster on average, and will be looking to get younger and cheaper in a lot of areas in the coming years. Their largest cap allocations currently lie in the secondary, quarterbacks, and offensive line, while at just 1.15%, their running back core is the cheapest in the NFL.
It should come as no surprise, but the Cardinals currently hold the 2nd oldest roster on average, and will be looking to get younger and cheaper in a lot of areas in the coming years. Their largest cap allocations currently lie in the secondary, quarterbacks, and offensive line, while at just 1.15%, their running back core is the cheapest in the NFL.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 33 | 1212 | 44 | 1111 | 99 | 1111 | 1212 | 44 | 6969 |
| Cap Hits | 28790000 $28.8M (1) | 1939843 $1.9M (32) | 24671425 $24.7M (7) | 6035141 $6.0M (26) | 27395792 $27.4M (16) | 11911931 $11.9M (30) | 23748497 $23.7M (14) | 34957804 $35.0M (6) | 4280000 $4.3M (20) | 163730433 $163.7M (9) |
| % of Cap | 17.091331743153 17.1% (1) | 1.1515977854336 1.2% (32) | 14.646318487368 14.6% (7) | 3.5827925303127 3.6% (26) | 16.263652985009 16.3% (16) | 7.0715791741072 7.1% (30) | 14.098417527901 14.1% (14) | 20.752880346513 20.8% (6) | 2.5408440382318 2.5% (20) | - |
| Total AAV | 28170000 $28.2M (1) | 1749843 $1.7M (32) | 19212175 $19.2M (15) | 8995825 $9.0M (18) | 22855745 $22.9M (25) | 12011981 $12.0M (31) | 34578441 $34.6M (4) | 43740674 $43.7M (2) | 4730000 $4.7M (19) | 176044684 $176.0M (7) |
| Avg. Age | 3232.0 (2) | 24.33333333333324.3 (5) | 26.33333333333326.3 (3) | 25.7525.8 (16) | 25.18181818181825.2 (24) | 26.11111111111126.1 (9) | 26.54545454545526.5 (8) | 26.08333333333326.1 (5) | 29.2529.3 (11) | 26.40579710144926.4 (2) |
Atlanta Falcons
Top 51 Cap Space: $5,031,730 | Draft Picks: 6 | Potential Draft Needs: DL, G, TE, S
The Falcons have a whopping $28M cap dollarsallocated to WRs currently, accounting for more than 17% of their overall cap - both the most of any NFL team. However their 6 linebackers account for just under $10M - 31st across the league and a potential value for them and a likely draft selection.
The Falcons have a whopping $28M cap dollarsallocated to WRs currently, accounting for more than 17% of their overall cap - both the most of any NFL team. However their 6 linebackers account for just under $10M - 31st across the league and a potential value for them and a likely draft selection.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 22 | 55 | 99 | 66 | 1010 | 1010 | 66 | 1212 | 44 | 6464 |
| Cap Hits | 27250000 $27.3M (3) | 4554417 $4.6M (27) | 28849651 $28.8M (1) | 5204190 $5.2M (28) | 26775664 $26.8M (18) | 27465058 $27.5M (12) | 9800731 $9.8M (31) | 24005983 $24.0M (20) | 6878334 $6.9M (10) | 160784028 $160.8M (13) |
| % of Cap | 16.177102813509 16.2% (3) | 2.7037531032878 2.7% (27) | 17.126743866453 17.1% (1) | 3.0894941904966 3.1% (28) | 15.895510804696 15.9% (18) | 16.304773102568 16.3% (12) | 5.8182544232859 5.8% (31) | 14.251275417627 14.3% (20) | 4.0833583964643 4.1% (10) | - |
| Total AAV | 25250000 $25.3M (5) | 3250999 $3.3M (30) | 28375860 $28.4M (2) | 6859190 $6.9M (23) | 31075470 $31.1M (13) | 26835564 $26.8M (12) | 9282792 $9.3M (32) | 33322537 $33.3M (9) | 6725583 $6.7M (8) | 170977945 $171.0M (8) |
| Avg. Age | 3333.0 (1) | 14.814.8 (31) | 26.55555555555626.6 (1) | 23.66666666666723.7 (31) | 26.726.7 (3) | 25.825.8 (13) | 25.33333333333325.3 (21) | 25.08333333333325.1 (23) | 30.2530.3 (5) | 26.0937526.1 (6) |
Baltimore Ravens
Top 51 Cap Space: $4,520,527 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: OLB, WR, CB
The Ravens boast the 4th average oldest roster currently, due in large part to their secondary and tight end core. While their special teams arsenal ($8.4M, 5% of the cap) might be slightly overpaid, their 7 defensive linemen account for just $10M combined - cheapest in the league.
The Ravens boast the 4th average oldest roster currently, due in large part to their secondary and tight end core. While their special teams arsenal ($8.4M, 5% of the cap) might be slightly overpaid, their 7 defensive linemen account for just $10M combined - cheapest in the league.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 77 | 77 | 66 | 1111 | 77 | 99 | 1313 | 33 | 6666 |
| Cap Hits | 27090000 $27.1M (4) | 6484553 $6.5M (19) | 14495767 $14.5M (22) | 12421133 $12.4M (7) | 21318029 $21.3M (29) | 10150036 $10.2M (32) | 14999539 $15.0M (23) | 35291372 $35.3M (5) | 8440000 $8.4M (2) | 150690429 $150.7M (26) |
| % of Cap | 16.08211798965 16.1% (4) | 3.8495882781888 3.8% (19) | 8.6054867199877 8.6% (22) | 7.3738695633492 7.4% (7) | 12.655557684931 12.7% (29) | 6.0256211351491 6.0% (32) | 8.90455356177 8.9% (23) | 20.950904707295 21.0% (5) | 5.0104494585693 5.0% (2) | - |
| Total AAV | 24673333 $24.7M (6) | 7659945 $7.7M (19) | 12423707 $12.4M (27) | 12804027 $12.8M (7) | 20547776 $20.5M (28) | 14605109 $14.6M (28) | 12791032 $12.8M (29) | 40325205 $40.3M (3) | 8570000 $8.6M (2) | 154400134 $154.4M (23) |
| Avg. Age | 28.66666666666728.7 (10) | 25.42857142857125.4 (3) | 25.57142857142925.6 (9) | 27.16666666666727.2 (5) | 2525.0 (28) | 24.85714285714324.9 (27) | 25.88888888888925.9 (13) | 27.23076923076927.2 (1) | 30.33333333333330.3 (4) | 26.25757575757626.3 (4) |
Buffalo Bills
Top 51 Cap Space: $10,556,512 | Draft Picks: 6 | Potential Draft Needs: CB, WR, TE, QB
The Bills are carrying the 4th youngest roster into the draft week, and have nearly 60% of their cap allocated to the offensive side of the ball right now. Across the league Buffalo has the 2nd most cap directed at running backs, 4th among offensive linemen, and 8th among tight ends. On the flip side the Bills have 13 defensive backs signed at a combined $13.6M in cap - cheapest in the league and a major draft need.
The Bills are carrying the 4th youngest roster into the draft week, and have nearly 60% of their cap allocated to the offensive side of the ball right now. Across the league Buffalo has the 2nd most cap directed at running backs, 4th among offensive linemen, and 8th among tight ends. On the flip side the Bills have 13 defensive backs signed at a combined $13.6M in cap - cheapest in the league and a major draft need.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 44 | 66 | 99 | 44 | 1313 | 1010 | 88 | 1313 | 33 | 7070 |
| Cap Hits | 10814182 $10.8M (21) | 13175228 $13.2M (2) | 12021379 $12.0M (29) | 10907500 $10.9M (8) | 38866495 $38.9M (4) | 31494704 $31.5M (8) | 18901584 $18.9M (16) | 13681368 $13.7M (32) | 4215000 $4.2M (22) | 154077440 $154.1M (21) |
| % of Cap | 6.4198948278163 6.4% (21) | 7.8215419430245 7.8% (2) | 7.136553542868 7.1% (29) | 6.4752935390219 6.5% (8) | 23.073294884981 23.1% (4) | 18.696993199597 18.7% (8) | 11.221022668116 11.2% (16) | 8.1220145601999 8.1% (32) | 2.502256453539 2.5% (22) | - |
| Total AAV | 16440848 $16.4M (21) | 12925288 $12.9M (3) | 11323801 $11.3M (29) | 9385000 $9.4M (17) | 34351622 $34.4M (8) | 30636087 $30.6M (9) | 16601781 $16.6M (21) | 17022512 $17.0M (29) | 4760000 $4.8M (18) | 153446880 $153.4M (25) |
| Avg. Age | 2626.0 (25) | 1717.0 (30) | 25.22222222222225.2 (13) | 25.525.5 (21) | 26.84615384615426.8 (1) | 25.725.7 (16) | 25.87525.9 (14) | 25.15384615384625.2 (21) | 26.66666666666726.7 (24) | 25.91428571428625.9 (15) |
Carolina Panthers
Top 51 Cap Space: $13,342,492 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: OL, RB, WR, DE/OLB
The Panthers are currently the oldest team in the league on average, and also have the 2nd most cap dollars allocated, split almost exactly 50/50 among offense and defense. Carolina has just $18.5M cap dollars allocated to 17 defensive backs, and $10.6M cap dollars allocated to 9 WRs. The Panthers are widely expected to snag a running back on draft day as they look to get younger (8th oldest) and cheaper (7th most) at that position.
The Panthers are currently the oldest team in the league on average, and also have the 2nd most cap dollars allocated, split almost exactly 50/50 among offense and defense. Carolina has just $18.5M cap dollars allocated to 17 defensive backs, and $10.6M cap dollars allocated to 9 WRs. The Panthers are widely expected to snag a running back on draft day as they look to get younger (8th oldest) and cheaper (7th most) at that position.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 44 | 66 | 99 | 55 | 1717 | 1010 | 88 | 1717 | 44 | 8080 |
| Cap Hits | 23875416 $23.9M (5) | 9726563 $9.7M (7) | 10619322 $10.6M (30) | 14761668 $14.8M (2) | 29796230 $29.8M (11) | 34866840 $34.9M (6) | 28577266 $28.6M (5) | 18496144 $18.5M (28) | 8205000 $8.2M (3) | 178924449 $178.9M (2) |
| % of Cap | 14.173763645772 14.2% (5) | 5.774224208186 5.8% (7) | 6.3042151854589 6.3% (30) | 8.7633402177938 8.8% (2) | 17.688685363851 17.7% (11) | 20.698879099529 20.7% (6) | 16.96504110866 17.0% (5) | 10.980331124457 11.0% (28) | 4.8709404985262 4.9% (3) | - |
| Total AAV | 24505000 $24.5M (8) | 11641594 $11.6M (5) | 10959618 $11.0M (30) | 11183333 $11.2M (9) | 37778074 $37.8M (5) | 35965254 $36.0M (5) | 28679058 $28.7M (8) | 21739331 $21.7M (24) | 8095000 $8.1M (3) | 190546232 $190.5M (3) |
| Avg. Age | 28.7528.8 (9) | 2222.0 (9) | 24.88888888888924.9 (19) | 27.827.8 (2) | 26.11764705882426.1 (11) | 26.826.8 (2) | 27.37527.4 (1) | 26.05882352941226.1 (7) | 29.7529.8 (7) | 26.662526.7 (1) |
Chicago Bears
Top 51 Cap Space: $26,253,556 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: QB, S, CB, LB, DE
Outside of their linebacking core ($33.5M/20%, 4th most in the league) the Bears cap spending is pretty much middle of the road across the board. Their defensive line ($14.25M/8%) is well below the league average, while their 3 running backs account for just under $4M in combined cap, 3rd lowest in the NFL.
Outside of their linebacking core ($33.5M/20%, 4th most in the league) the Bears cap spending is pretty much middle of the road across the board. Their defensive line ($14.25M/8%) is well below the league average, while their 3 running backs account for just under $4M in combined cap, 3rd lowest in the NFL.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 66 | 1212 | 55 | 1111 | 99 | 1111 | 1818 | 33 | 7878 |
| Cap Hits | 16371250 $16.4M (19) | 3928756 $3.9M (30) | 21237945 $21.2M (10) | 9490833 $9.5M (11) | 29199028 $29.2M (12) | 14252293 $14.3M (28) | 33515794 $33.5M (4) | 28139392 $28.1M (16) | 2026327 $2.0M (32) | 158161618 $158.2M (16) |
| % of Cap | 9.718876860024 9.7% (19) | 2.3323262290345 2.3% (30) | 12.608015405969 12.6% (10) | 5.6342818798841 5.6% (11) | 17.334153321487 17.3% (12) | 8.460947126211 8.5% (28) | 19.896823684931 19.9% (4) | 16.705094953894 16.7% (16) | 1.20293945735 1.2% (32) | - |
| Total AAV | 17465000 $17.5M (19) | 3908757 $3.9M (29) | 21642762 $21.6M (10) | 10505000 $10.5M (13) | 30182500 $30.2M (14) | 12080059 $12.1M (30) | 37669495 $37.7M (1) | 28401001 $28.4M (18) | 2041327 $2.0M (32) | 163895901 $163.9M (14) |
| Avg. Age | 27.33333333333327.3 (15) | 24.33333333333324.3 (6) | 25.41666666666725.4 (10) | 26.426.4 (13) | 26.09090909090926.1 (13) | 26.11111111111126.1 (10) | 26.81818181818226.8 (6) | 25.38888888888925.4 (18) | 28.66666666666728.7 (12) | 25.96153846153826.0 (13) |
Cincinnati Bengals
Top 51 Cap Space: $22,378,270 | Draft Picks: 11 | Potential Draft Needs: OL, LB, Pass Rush
The Bengals' offensive line was gutted this past free agent season, dropping their current OL cap allocations to 10.3% (2nd lowest in the NFL). This figure is offset by above average spending in their secondary, on the defensive line, and at the wide receiver position. With 11 picks in the upcoming draft, the Bengals will be a team to watch.
The Bengals' offensive line was gutted this past free agent season, dropping their current OL cap allocations to 10.3% (2nd lowest in the NFL). This figure is offset by above average spending in their secondary, on the defensive line, and at the wide receiver position. With 11 picks in the upcoming draft, the Bengals will be a team to watch.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 55 | 88 | 33 | 1010 | 1414 | 66 | 1212 | 44 | 6565 |
| Cap Hits | 16975413 $17.0M (18) | 8696828 $8.7M (11) | 21977930 $22.0M (8) | 6250134 $6.3M (25) | 17476591 $17.5M (31) | 30987979 $31.0M (9) | 14213577 $14.2M (25) | 34918960 $34.9M (7) | 5410000 $5.4M (14) | 156907412 $156.9M (19) |
| % of Cap | 10.077541335882 10.1% (18) | 5.1629167232074 5.2% (11) | 13.04731131149 13.0% (8) | 3.7104242317874 3.7% (25) | 10.375068236207 10.4% (31) | 18.39617329416 18.4% (9) | 8.4379631734577 8.4% (25) | 20.729820405901 20.7% (7) | 3.2116743567369 3.2% (14) | - |
| Total AAV | 17213548 $17.2M (20) | 10265094 $10.3M (8) | 23281725 $23.3M (7) | 3437510 $3.4M (30) | 16995837 $17.0M (31) | 31546692 $31.5M (8) | 14438327 $14.4M (25) | 37235478 $37.2M (6) | 5037500 $5.0M (16) | 159451685 $159.5M (18) |
| Avg. Age | 2626.0 (24) | 20.620.6 (18) | 2525.0 (16) | 24.66666666666724.7 (28) | 25.725.7 (21) | 26.42857142857126.4 (5) | 25.525.5 (18) | 25.41666666666725.4 (16) | 28.528.5 (14) | 25.84615384615425.8 (17) |
Cleveland Browns
Top 51 Cap Space: $61,078,874 | Draft Picks: 11 | Potential Draft Needs: QB, Pass Rush, DB
The Browns bolstered their offensive line through free agency ($49.7M, 29.5%, both most in the NFL) and will look to fill in the rest of their blanks with 11 potential draft picks next week. Outside of their OL, Cleveland doesn't have another positional group allocated with Top 10 cap dollars, and are well below average on the defensive line.
The Browns bolstered their offensive line through free agency ($49.7M, 29.5%, both most in the NFL) and will look to fill in the rest of their blanks with 11 potential draft picks next week. Outside of their OL, Cleveland doesn't have another positional group allocated with Top 10 cap dollars, and are well below average on the defensive line.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 55 | 1111 | 44 | 1515 | 99 | 1010 | 1313 | 44 | 7474 |
| Cap Hits | 17310246 $17.3M (17) | 5271023 $5.3M (24) | 14061327 $14.1M (23) | 5482732 $5.5M (27) | 49755880 $49.8M (1) | 12471719 $12.5M (29) | 24345030 $24.3M (12) | 24977841 $25.0M (18) | 5770000 $5.8M (12) | 159445798 $159.4M (14) |
| % of Cap | 10.276316670427 10.3% (17) | 3.1291699450778 3.1% (24) | 8.3475791770042 8.3% (23) | 3.2548520830427 3.3% (27) | 29.537834360976 29.5% (1) | 7.4039002027225 7.4% (29) | 14.452552414971 14.5% (12) | 14.82822392354 14.8% (18) | 3.42539021042 3.4% (12) | - |
| Total AAV | 19342271 $19.3M (16) | 5197384 $5.2M (25) | 17090677 $17.1M (19) | 5890232 $5.9M (26) | 48751991 $48.8M (1) | 10519864 $10.5M (32) | 22602820 $22.6M (13) | 26422842 $26.4M (20) | 5016667 $5.0M (17) | 160834726 $160.8M (16) |
| Avg. Age | 24.33333333333324.3 (30) | 18.818.8 (26) | 24.45454545454524.5 (28) | 25.525.5 (20) | 25.86666666666725.9 (16) | 24.77777777777824.8 (29) | 24.724.7 (31) | 24.15384615384624.2 (32) | 27.2527.3 (20) | 24.87837837837824.9 (32) |
Dallas Cowboys
Top 51 Cap Space: $4,921,045 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: DL, DB, LB, TE
31% of the Cowboys' active roster salary cap is allocated to Tight Ends (10%), Wide Receivers (16%), and Running Backs (6%). On the flip side, Dallas has just 1% ($1.7M) allocated to 3 Quarterbacks, and 8% ($15M) to 10 defensive backs. The Cowboys have a bit of cap to shed and should still be a team to watch this summer.
31% of the Cowboys' active roster salary cap is allocated to Tight Ends (10%), Wide Receivers (16%), and Running Backs (6%). On the flip side, Dallas has just 1% ($1.7M) allocated to 3 Quarterbacks, and 8% ($15M) to 10 defensive backs. The Cowboys have a bit of cap to shed and should still be a team to watch this summer.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 55 | 99 | 55 | 1313 | 1111 | 1111 | 1010 | 33 | 7070 |
| Cap Hits | 1715848 $1.7M (32) | 9809395 $9.8M (6) | 27403334 $27.4M (3) | 16895683 $16.9M (1) | 24579058 $24.6M (19) | 22695624 $22.7M (18) | 18439800 $18.4M (18) | 14856830 $14.9M (31) | 6970000 $7.0M (9) | 143365572 $143.4M (29) |
| % of Cap | 1.0186220003065 1.0% (32) | 5.8233978514979 5.8% (6) | 16.268130332144 16.3% (3) | 10.030209210842 10.0% (1) | 14.591484342209 14.6% (19) | 13.473374050082 13.5% (18) | 10.946882218735 10.9% (18) | 8.8198336290943 8.8% (31) | 4.1377763893635 4.1% (9) | - |
| Total AAV | 1965848 $2.0M (32) | 10274110 $10.3M (7) | 25349833 $25.3M (3) | 11783684 $11.8M (8) | 32640122 $32.6M (10) | 21163678 $21.2M (21) | 17778859 $17.8M (20) | 14685394 $14.7M (30) | 5714286 $5.7M (12) | 141355789 $141.4M (30) |
| Avg. Age | 2525.0 (29) | 20.620.6 (19) | 2626.0 (5) | 26.426.4 (14) | 25.76923076923125.8 (19) | 24.72727272727324.7 (30) | 25.09090909090925.1 (24) | 25.125.1 (22) | 30.66666666666730.7 (3) | 25.64285714285725.6 (21) |
Denver Broncos
Top 51 Cap Space: $14,550,357 | Draft Picks: 10 | Potential Draft Needs: OT, RB/WR, TE
With a linebacker core (20.3%) and secondary (23.5%) accounting for nearly 47% of the Broncos active roster cap, Denver is banking on value in a lot of positional groupings this season. This is no more evident than at the QB position (1.6%, $2.67M, 3rd lowest in the NFL). Denver has 10 picks next week and are carrying below average cap spending on both their offensive and defensive lines.
With a linebacker core (20.3%) and secondary (23.5%) accounting for nearly 47% of the Broncos active roster cap, Denver is banking on value in a lot of positional groupings this season. This is no more evident than at the QB position (1.6%, $2.67M, 3rd lowest in the NFL). Denver has 10 picks next week and are carrying below average cap spending on both their offensive and defensive lines.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 22 | 77 | 99 | 77 | 1212 | 1010 | 1010 | 99 | 44 | 7070 |
| Cap Hits | 2781899 $2.8M (30) | 6601925 $6.6M (18) | 26065858 $26.1M (4) | 6560201 $6.6M (23) | 23883428 $23.9M (22) | 18444978 $18.4M (25) | 34195121 $34.2M (3) | 39712581 $39.7M (2) | 4311002 $4.3M (19) | 162556993 $162.6M (10) |
| % of Cap | 1.6514886656806 1.7% (30) | 3.9192667703513 3.9% (18) | 15.47413081792 15.5% (4) | 3.8944971029094 3.9% (23) | 14.178520010827 14.2% (22) | 10.949956165097 10.9% (25) | 20.300109656417 20.3% (3) | 23.575578195479 23.6% (2) | 2.5592485351648 2.6% (19) | - |
| Total AAV | 2952270 $3.0M (29) | 8306948 $8.3M (17) | 29152163 $29.2M (1) | 5991465 $6.0M (25) | 25701479 $25.7M (21) | 20144476 $20.1M (23) | 35991207 $36.0M (2) | 34854912 $34.9M (7) | 4356002 $4.4M (23) | 167450899 $167.5M (10) |
| Avg. Age | 2424.0 (31) | 21.14285714285721.1 (15) | 2525.0 (17) | 24.57142857142924.6 (29) | 25.83333333333325.8 (17) | 25.725.7 (15) | 24.924.9 (27) | 2626.0 (8) | 24.2524.3 (32) | 25.18571428571425.2 (28) |
Detroit Lions
Top 51 Cap Space: $5,699,159 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: Pass Rush, CB, DL, WR
Outside of their special teams unit (5.25%, $8.8M, 1st in the league) the Lions are "middle-of-the-road" spenders elsewher across the board. Their secondary cap allocations (19.5%, $32M, 10th) are slightly above average while their linebacking core (7.2%, $12M, 29th) is well below. Detroit still has a bit of cap to shed as well.
Outside of their special teams unit (5.25%, $8.8M, 1st in the league) the Lions are "middle-of-the-road" spenders elsewher across the board. Their secondary cap allocations (19.5%, $32M, 10th) are slightly above average while their linebacking core (7.2%, $12M, 29th) is well below. Detroit still has a bit of cap to shed as well.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 22 | 66 | 88 | 55 | 1212 | 99 | 99 | 1414 | 44 | 6969 |
| Cap Hits | 22540000 $22.5M (8) | 5985187 $6.0M (21) | 20421250 $20.4M (14) | 6570788 $6.6M (22) | 23763849 $23.8M (24) | 29304392 $29.3M (11) | 12128615 $12.1M (29) | 32866625 $32.9M (10) | 8835089 $8.8M (1) | 162415795 $162.4M (11) |
| % of Cap | 13.380987061155 13.4% (8) | 3.5531370809936 3.6% (21) | 12.123180213958 12.1% (14) | 3.9007821299732 3.9% (22) | 14.10753132175 14.1% (24) | 17.396703202619 17.4% (11) | 7.200214746439 7.2% (29) | 19.511441165432 19.5% (10) | 5.2449960777798 5.2% (1) | - |
| Total AAV | 18161667 $18.2M (18) | 7410754 $7.4M (20) | 17935000 $17.9M (18) | 5850620 $5.9M (27) | 29920985 $29.9M (15) | 21530469 $21.5M (19) | 11510283 $11.5M (31) | 29667125 $29.7M (15) | 8090158 $8.1M (4) | 150077036 $150.1M (26) |
| Avg. Age | 26.526.5 (21) | 20.16666666666720.2 (22) | 25.7525.8 (7) | 25.225.2 (25) | 25.16666666666725.2 (26) | 26.22222222222226.2 (8) | 24.77777777777824.8 (29) | 25.07142857142925.1 (24) | 29.529.5 (9) | 25.52173913043525.5 (24) |
Green Bay Packers
Top 51 Cap Space: $21,437,826 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: RB, OL, CB
The loss of Eddie Lacy and James Stark has plummeted the Packers running back cap allocation to 31st in the league (1.8%, $3.1M). On the flip side Green Bay's 9 wide receivers account for more than $28M (17%, 2nd most in the NFL). Their biggest defecits elsewhere come from the offensive line and secondary, both expected to be addressed in next week's draft.
The loss of Eddie Lacy and James Stark has plummeted the Packers running back cap allocation to 31st in the league (1.8%, $3.1M). On the flip side Green Bay's 9 wide receivers account for more than $28M (17%, 2nd most in the NFL). Their biggest defecits elsewhere come from the offensive line and secondary, both expected to be addressed in next week's draft.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 55 | 99 | 44 | 1010 | 88 | 99 | 1111 | 44 | 6363 |
| Cap Hits | 21510908 $21.5M (11) | 3150235 $3.2M (31) | 28692429 $28.7M (2) | 8013504 $8.0M (21) | 22893124 $22.9M (26) | 20125160 $20.1M (21) | 26405404 $26.4M (9) | 19031400 $19.0M (27) | 5145000 $5.1M (16) | 154967164 $155.0M (20) |
| % of Cap | 12.770061296438 12.8% (11) | 1.8701532286867 1.9% (31) | 17.033408216598 17.0% (2) | 4.7572579120904 4.8% (21) | 13.590620942033 13.6% (26) | 11.947404860855 11.9% (21) | 15.675704049183 15.7% (9) | 11.298088604954 11.3% (27) | 3.0543557422203 3.1% (16) | - |
| Total AAV | 23120908 $23.1M (10) | 3123846 $3.1M (31) | 23845493 $23.8M (5) | 10155254 $10.2M (15) | 25713858 $25.7M (20) | 20454593 $20.5M (22) | 30518600 $30.5M (6) | 17179156 $17.2M (28) | 5705000 $5.7M (13) | 159816660 $159.8M (17) |
| Avg. Age | 26.33333333333326.3 (22) | 14.414.4 (32) | 24.77777777777824.8 (22) | 2727.0 (6) | 24.824.8 (29) | 2525.0 (25) | 25.55555555555625.6 (17) | 24.72727272727324.7 (29) | 26.526.5 (27) | 25.17460317460325.2 (29) |
Houston Texans
Top 51 Cap Space: $30,684,916 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: OT, TE, QB, S
Generally speaking, the Texans are underspending at nearly every position in comparison to the league average. This is certainly evident at the QB position (1.4%, $2.4M, 2nd lowest in the NFL). 18% of the Texans' active cap is allocated to the offensive line, but that shouldn't stop them from drafting a tackle next week.
Generally speaking, the Texans are underspending at nearly every position in comparison to the league average. This is certainly evident at the QB position (1.4%, $2.4M, 2nd lowest in the NFL). 18% of the Texans' active cap is allocated to the offensive line, but that shouldn't stop them from drafting a tackle next week.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 22 | 66 | 88 | 44 | 1111 | 99 | 88 | 1111 | 55 | 6464 |
| Cap Hits | 2390146 $2.4M (31) | 9686045 $9.7M (8) | 14039404 $14.0M (24) | 6554492 $6.6M (24) | 30466807 $30.5M (8) | 19051799 $19.1M (24) | 26111499 $26.1M (10) | 25301406 $25.3M (17) | 5032500 $5.0M (17) | 138634098 $138.6M (31) |
| % of Cap | 1.4189224800476 1.4% (31) | 5.750170488854 5.8% (8) | 8.3345644751701 8.3% (24) | 3.8911079256631 3.9% (24) | 18.086776852783 18.1% (8) | 11.310198576341 11.3% (24) | 15.501225832581 15.5% (10) | 15.020309951865 15.0% (17) | 2.9875695379443 3.0% (17) | - |
| Total AAV | 2630146 $2.6M (31) | 9371069 $9.4M (11) | 8293181 $8.3M (32) | 4925446 $4.9M (28) | 29424310 $29.4M (17) | 21224372 $21.2M (20) | 24254531 $24.3M (10) | 22856509 $22.9M (22) | 5176667 $5.2M (14) | 128156207 $128.2M (32) |
| Avg. Age | 29.529.5 (5) | 20.33333333333320.3 (20) | 2121.0 (32) | 25.7525.8 (17) | 26.36363636363626.4 (6) | 23.88888888888923.9 (32) | 25.525.5 (19) | 25.81818181818225.8 (11) | 30.230.2 (6) | 25.312525.3 (26) |
Indianapolis Colts
Top 51 Cap Space: $23,035,683 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: LB, Pass Rush, OL, RB
The Colts have done well to get younger and cheaper over the past two seasons (23th youngest currently), and have made financial efforts to bolster their defensive line as well ($29M, 10th most). They'll need to address the offensive line (again) this spring ($22M, 27th most) and are near the bottom in spending with linebackers, defensive backs, and running backs as well.
The Colts have done well to get younger and cheaper over the past two seasons (23th youngest currently), and have made financial efforts to bolster their defensive line as well ($29M, 10th most). They'll need to address the offensive line (again) this spring ($22M, 27th most) and are near the bottom in spending with linebackers, defensive backs, and running backs as well.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 33 | 99 | 33 | 1313 | 1010 | 1010 | 1717 | 55 | 7373 |
| Cap Hits | 21940000 $21.9M (10) | 5424583 $5.4M (22) | 19601629 $19.6M (15) | 9235000 $9.2M (13) | 22619403 $22.6M (27) | 29650476 $29.7M (10) | 16282476 $16.3M (21) | 22322414 $22.3M (23) | 6330000 $6.3M (11) | 153405981 $153.4M (23) |
| % of Cap | 13.024793971684 13.0% (10) | 3.2203316297766 3.2% (22) | 11.636607986982 11.6% (15) | 5.4824053021194 5.5% (13) | 13.428125060961 13.4% (27) | 17.602157751247 17.6% (10) | 9.666175717816 9.7% (21) | 13.251816011879 13.3% (23) | 3.757837093927 3.8% (11) | - |
| Total AAV | 26929000 $26.9M (3) | 5893333 $5.9M (23) | 21095984 $21.1M (12) | 7635000 $7.6M (22) | 21008008 $21.0M (27) | 29720587 $29.7M (10) | 14879977 $14.9M (24) | 21727126 $21.7M (25) | 6790000 $6.8M (7) | 155679015 $155.7M (21) |
| Avg. Age | 26.66666666666726.7 (19) | 27.66666666666727.7 (1) | 24.55555555555624.6 (26) | 26.33333333333326.3 (15) | 24.53846153846224.5 (30) | 26.426.4 (6) | 24.924.9 (28) | 2525.0 (25) | 29.629.6 (8) | 25.5890410958925.6 (23) |
Jacksonville Jaguars
Top 51 Cap Space: $52,037,255 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: OG, Pass Rush, TE
Jacksonville used it's plethora of cap space to bring in 12 free agents this offseason ($172M). The graph above shows the Jags spending habits have been almost identical to the league average positionally, with the exception of an elite-paid WR, and a young QB under contract (for now). Jacksonville has focused it's recent cap dollars to the defensive line, and will switch gears to the offensive side of the ball come draft time.
Jacksonville used it's plethora of cap space to bring in 12 free agents this offseason ($172M). The graph above shows the Jags spending habits have been almost identical to the league average positionally, with the exception of an elite-paid WR, and a young QB under contract (for now). Jacksonville has focused it's recent cap dollars to the defensive line, and will switch gears to the offensive side of the ball come draft time.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 66 | 1010 | 77 | 1515 | 1111 | 1010 | 1212 | 33 | 7777 |
| Cap Hits | 10643053 $10.6M (22) | 9303266 $9.3M (10) | 13784328 $13.8M (25) | 8700000 $8.7M (16) | 27322812 $27.3M (17) | 35866635 $35.9M (5) | 20982509 $21.0M (15) | 31036144 $31.0M (13) | 3290000 $3.3M (27) | 160928747 $160.9M (12) |
| % of Cap | 6.3183032158026 6.3% (22) | 5.5229317645292 5.5% (10) | 8.1831372943533 8.2% (25) | 5.1647997973404 5.2% (16) | 16.220328032226 16.2% (17) | 21.292412549343 21.3% (5) | 12.456374509298 12.5% (15) | 18.424766694417 18.4% (13) | 1.9531254406034 2.0% (27) | - |
| Total AAV | 9279772 $9.3M (23) | 9545137 $9.5M (10) | 16219678 $16.2M (21) | 8280000 $8.3M (20) | 26329062 $26.3M (19) | 39082699 $39.1M (4) | 18088936 $18.1M (19) | 37849851 $37.8M (5) | 3628542 $3.6M (26) | 168303651 $168.3M (9) |
| Avg. Age | 26.66666666666726.7 (20) | 21.33333333333321.3 (14) | 25.325.3 (12) | 25.71428571428625.7 (18) | 2626.0 (14) | 25.27272727272725.3 (21) | 25.825.8 (15) | 2525.0 (26) | 26.33333333333326.3 (28) | 25.6103896103925.6 (22) |
Kansas City Chiefs
Top 51 Cap Space: $1,137,571 | Draft Picks: 10 | Potential Draft Needs: CB, LB, QB, WR
New deals for Eric Berry (S) and Ron Parker (DB), shouldn't keep the Chiefs from locating a shut down corner in the upcoming draft. Kansas City's defensive back cap allocations (12.8%) are well below the league average. Their linebacking core ($41M, most in the NFL) is also the 3rd oldest on average.
New deals for Eric Berry (S) and Ron Parker (DB), shouldn't keep the Chiefs from locating a shut down corner in the upcoming draft. Kansas City's defensive back cap allocations (12.8%) are well below the league average. Their linebacking core ($41M, most in the NFL) is also the 3rd oldest on average.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 66 | 77 | 55 | 1313 | 1313 | 1111 | 1313 | 33 | 7474 |
| Cap Hits | 18683750 $18.7M (16) | 6360416 $6.4M (20) | 17718188 $17.7M (19) | 8768963 $8.8M (15) | 29826309 $29.8M (10) | 27263566 $27.3M (13) | 41579864 $41.6M (1) | 21610996 $21.6M (24) | 7422000 $7.4M (6) | 179234052 $179.2M (1) |
| % of Cap | 11.091704392363 11.1% (16) | 3.7758937089426 3.8% (20) | 10.518493539269 10.5% (19) | 5.2057400373891 5.2% (15) | 17.706541917082 17.7% (10) | 16.185156339262 16.2% (13) | 24.684100363292 24.7% (1) | 12.829479053003 12.8% (24) | 4.4061085167656 4.4% (6) | - |
| Total AAV | 18427500 $18.4M (17) | 7918385 $7.9M (18) | 16220046 $16.2M (20) | 13481714 $13.5M (6) | 36480777 $36.5M (6) | 26443685 $26.4M (13) | 35489655 $35.5M (3) | 30181201 $30.2M (13) | 6437000 $6.4M (11) | 191079911 $191.1M (2) |
| Avg. Age | 2727.0 (16) | 17.16666666666717.2 (29) | 24.14285714285724.1 (30) | 25.425.4 (22) | 25.69230769230825.7 (22) | 25.69230769230825.7 (17) | 27.09090909090927.1 (3) | 2525.0 (27) | 28.66666666666728.7 (13) | 25.79729729729725.8 (18) |
Los Angeles Rams
Top 51 Cap Space: $1,392,935 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: OL, TE/WR, DB
The Rams have allocated 45% of their active salary cap to linebackers and defensive backs, but will look to shift some of that to the offensive line come draft time. With just $1.7M (1%, lowest in the NFL) allocated to 3 tight ends, and 60% of the WR cap total allocated to Tavon Austin, the Rams will be looking for a pass catcher or two come draft time.
The Rams have allocated 45% of their active salary cap to linebackers and defensive backs, but will look to shift some of that to the offensive line come draft time. With just $1.7M (1%, lowest in the NFL) allocated to 3 tight ends, and 60% of the WR cap total allocated to Tavon Austin, the Rams will be looking for a pass catcher or two come draft time.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 66 | 99 | 33 | 1414 | 88 | 1111 | 1616 | 44 | 7474 |
| Cap Hits | 7850957 $7.9M (26) | 8591515 $8.6M (13) | 25776967 $25.8M (5) | 1730111 $1.7M (32) | 29178813 $29.2M (13) | 20209250 $20.2M (20) | 37375949 $37.4M (2) | 33349131 $33.3M (9) | 5338773 $5.3M (15) | 169401466 $169.4M (6) |
| % of Cap | 4.6607610485664 4.7% (26) | 5.1003971184881 5.1% (13) | 15.302629188236 15.3% (5) | 1.0270893036984 1.0% (32) | 17.322152582647 17.3% (13) | 11.997325322345 12.0% (20) | 22.188424577081 22.2% (2) | 19.797883336814 19.8% (9) | 3.1693900814306 3.2% (15) | - |
| Total AAV | 8412142 $8.4M (26) | 8430822 $8.4M (16) | 21294852 $21.3M (11) | 1865111 $1.9M (32) | 29525557 $29.5M (16) | 19656458 $19.7M (24) | 32357848 $32.4M (5) | 30443811 $30.4M (12) | 6621250 $6.6M (9) | 158607825 $158.6M (20) |
| Avg. Age | 2424.0 (32) | 20.33333333333320.3 (21) | 24.55555555555624.6 (27) | 23.66666666666723.7 (32) | 25.92857142857125.9 (15) | 2525.0 (26) | 25.09090909090925.1 (25) | 24.687524.7 (30) | 27.527.5 (18) | 25.08108108108125.1 (30) |
Los Angeles Chargers
Top 51 Cap Space: $14,100,451 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: DB, OL, LB
The new defensive scheme requires flexibility from the safety position, something the current Chargers' roster doesn't boast. Meanwhile the Chargers' two 2016 free agent signings to the offensive line (Franklin/Barksdale) were major disappointments. LA will need to reach higher to improve Philip Rivers' protection.
The new defensive scheme requires flexibility from the safety position, something the current Chargers' roster doesn't boast. Meanwhile the Chargers' two 2016 free agent signings to the offensive line (Franklin/Barksdale) were major disappointments. LA will need to reach higher to improve Philip Rivers' protection.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 66 | 88 | 66 | 1313 | 99 | 1212 | 1212 | 33 | 7272 |
| Cap Hits | 21160000 $21.2M (12) | 5402358 $5.4M (23) | 20596000 $20.6M (13) | 9272569 $9.3M (12) | 28614904 $28.6M (14) | 24373029 $24.4M (16) | 23787951 $23.8M (13) | 21565364 $21.6M (25) | 2250124 $2.3M (31) | 157022299 $157.0M (18) |
| % of Cap | 12.56174295537 12.6% (12) | 3.2071376440874 3.2% (23) | 12.226921451267 12.2% (13) | 5.5047083324166 5.5% (12) | 16.987385101163 17.0% (14) | 14.469174165491 14.5% (16) | 14.121839598154 14.1% (13) | 12.802389381238 12.8% (25) | 1.3357976987576 1.3% (31) | - |
| Total AAV | 22357500 $22.4M (12) | 5204888 $5.2M (24) | 22546000 $22.5M (8) | 9640077 $9.6M (16) | 34510779 $34.5M (7) | 26220788 $26.2M (15) | 23212821 $23.2M (12) | 20865958 $20.9M (26) | 2252623 $2.3M (31) | 166811410 $166.8M (12) |
| Avg. Age | 30.66666666666730.7 (4) | 20.66666666666720.7 (17) | 25.37525.4 (11) | 28.528.5 (1) | 26.23076923076926.2 (7) | 26.11111111111126.1 (11) | 24.7524.8 (30) | 25.83333333333325.8 (10) | 26.66666666666726.7 (25) | 26.06944444444426.1 (7) |
Miami Dolphins
Top 51 Cap Space: $18,905,698 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: OG, DT, S
The Dolphins made a lot of noise this winter, with notable releases, a few trades, and quality extensions. The result is a salary cap that provides great value at the running back and wide receivers positions, leaving room to bolster the offensive line and secondary this April.
The Dolphins made a lot of noise this winter, with notable releases, a few trades, and quality extensions. The result is a salary cap that provides great value at the running back and wide receivers positions, leaving room to bolster the offensive line and secondary this April.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 44 | 55 | 66 | 55 | 1212 | 1010 | 99 | 1212 | 44 | 6767 |
| Cap Hits | 23605000 $23.6M (6) | 4347518 $4.3M (28) | 9672176 $9.7M (31) | 10430000 $10.4M (10) | 23879713 $23.9M (23) | 40816372 $40.8M (2) | 13816459 $13.8M (26) | 23886849 $23.9M (21) | 2390334 $2.4M (30) | 152844421 $152.8M (24) |
| % of Cap | 14.013229794968 14.0% (6) | 2.5809264465901 2.6% (28) | 5.7419370855909 5.7% (31) | 6.1918232053173 6.2% (10) | 14.176314581948 14.2% (23) | 24.23084940618 24.2% (2) | 8.2022120279496 8.2% (26) | 14.180550905092 14.2% (21) | 1.4190340872156 1.4% (30) | - |
| Total AAV | 22225000 $22.2M (14) | 4437518 $4.4M (28) | 13478056 $13.5M (26) | 11050000 $11.1M (10) | 24094846 $24.1M (22) | 44242215 $44.2M (3) | 21102833 $21.1M (16) | 34133186 $34.1M (8) | 2585333 $2.6M (30) | 177348987 $177.3M (5) |
| Avg. Age | 27.7527.8 (14) | 2424.0 (8) | 2424.0 (31) | 27.227.2 (4) | 26.526.5 (5) | 27.427.4 (1) | 26.88888888888926.9 (5) | 25.58333333333325.6 (13) | 27.7527.8 (17) | 26.31343283582126.3 (3) |
Minnesota Vikings
Top 51 Cap Space: $15,688,611 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: OL, DL, RB, LB
The Vikings addressed their offensive tackle needs through free agency (Reiff, Remmers) but still need to get younger and cheaper at the Guard and Center positions. On the other side of the ball Minnesota's linebacking core accounts for just 8% of their active roster cap, 27th in the league. Both the running back and wide receiver cores are well below the league spending averages at this point as well.
The Vikings addressed their offensive tackle needs through free agency (Reiff, Remmers) but still need to get younger and cheaper at the Guard and Center positions. On the other side of the ball Minnesota's linebacking core accounts for just 8% of their active roster cap, 27th in the league. Both the running back and wide receiver cores are well below the league spending averages at this point as well.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 44 | 44 | 99 | 44 | 1313 | 1010 | 77 | 1313 | 55 | 6969 |
| Cap Hits | 22703971 $22.7M (7) | 4940000 $4.9M (26) | 12160877 $12.2M (28) | 8313864 $8.3M (19) | 27548738 $27.5M (15) | 33233092 $33.2M (7) | 13699908 $13.7M (27) | 32147093 $32.1M (11) | 3390000 $3.4M (26) | 158137543 $158.1M (17) |
| % of Cap | 13.478329289612 13.5% (7) | 2.9326564366507 2.9% (26) | 7.2193672488599 7.2% (28) | 4.9355681726799 4.9% (19) | 16.354450165446 16.4% (15) | 19.728996186965 19.7% (7) | 8.1330209266646 8.1% (27) | 19.084287288676 19.1% (11) | 2.0124909555154 2.0% (26) | - |
| Total AAV | 22240709 $22.2M (13) | 6831250 $6.8M (22) | 13977173 $14.0M (24) | 8858864 $8.9M (19) | 31759239 $31.8M (12) | 25576100 $25.6M (16) | 12745104 $12.7M (30) | 29022252 $29.0M (16) | 3346471 $3.3M (27) | 154357162 $154.4M (24) |
| Avg. Age | 26.7526.8 (18) | 24.2524.3 (7) | 24.66666666666724.7 (25) | 25.2525.3 (23) | 26.15384615384626.2 (10) | 26.826.8 (3) | 2525.0 (26) | 26.38461538461526.4 (4) | 26.226.2 (29) | 25.85507246376825.9 (16) |
New England Patriots
Top 51 Cap Space: $20,629,022 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: Pass Rush, OL, CB
The Patriots are a deep roster right now, and have already addressed most of their major needs via free agency/trade. However the long-term outlook shows a possible need to replace Ninkovich, Malcolm Butler, and Nate Solder after 2017. In terms of spending New England is at or below average in almost every positional group, with the exception of defensive back, largely due to the blockbuster signing of Stephon Gilmore this March.
The Patriots are a deep roster right now, and have already addressed most of their major needs via free agency/trade. However the long-term outlook shows a possible need to replace Ninkovich, Malcolm Butler, and Nate Solder after 2017. In terms of spending New England is at or below average in almost every positional group, with the exception of defensive back, largely due to the blockbuster signing of Stephon Gilmore this March.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 77 | 88 | 55 | 1111 | 1010 | 66 | 1212 | 33 | 6565 |
| Cap Hits | 15883702 $15.9M (20) | 7961772 $8.0M (16) | 21406864 $21.4M (9) | 13382500 $13.4M (5) | 21681495 $21.7M (28) | 15031083 $15.0M (27) | 12475927 $12.5M (28) | 37185227 $37.2M (3) | 7085000 $7.1M (8) | 152093570 $152.1M (25) |
| % of Cap | 9.429441479381 9.4% (20) | 4.7265469439161 4.7% (16) | 12.708295040103 12.7% (9) | 7.9445900330928 7.9% (5) | 12.871331147361 12.9% (28) | 8.9232798197938 8.9% (27) | 7.40639830359 7.4% (28) | 22.075201479731 22.1% (3) | 4.2060467315123 4.2% (8) | - |
| Total AAV | 22223683 $22.2M (15) | 14195052 $14.2M (2) | 17975361 $18.0M (17) | 18205000 $18.2M (1) | 23679327 $23.7M (24) | 17064852 $17.1M (26) | 16282280 $16.3M (22) | 39512862 $39.5M (4) | 6953333 $7.0M (6) | 176091698 $176.1M (6) |
| Avg. Age | 29.33333333333329.3 (8) | 18.57142857142918.6 (28) | 26.526.5 (2) | 2727.0 (7) | 25.09090909090925.1 (27) | 25.925.9 (12) | 25.33333333333325.3 (22) | 25.41666666666725.4 (17) | 28.33333333333328.3 (15) | 26.06153846153826.1 (8) |
New Orleans Saints
Top 51 Cap Space: $7,298,103 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: DB, LB, WR, QB
The Saints made a lot of tough moves this offseason to clean up their roster/cap number, but still have needs in both areas. Just 33% of the Saints active salary cap is allocated to the defensive side of the ball. That should change come draft time. The loss of Brandin Cooks dropped New Orleans' WR cap allocations down to 4.8%, the lowest in the NFL. Don't be surprised to see a high selection used for a QB here as well.
The Saints made a lot of tough moves this offseason to clean up their roster/cap number, but still have needs in both areas. Just 33% of the Saints active salary cap is allocated to the defensive side of the ball. That should change come draft time. The loss of Brandin Cooks dropped New Orleans' WR cap allocations down to 4.8%, the lowest in the NFL. Don't be surprised to see a high selection used for a QB here as well.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 55 | 99 | 77 | 99 | 1111 | 1010 | 1717 | 33 | 7474 |
| Cap Hits | 20155000 $20.2M (14) | 7826191 $7.8M (17) | 8093403 $8.1M (32) | 14270832 $14.3M (3) | 30203983 $30.2M (9) | 22473023 $22.5M (19) | 17824916 $17.8M (19) | 16181256 $16.2M (30) | 5705000 $5.7M (13) | 142733604 $142.7M (30) |
| % of Cap | 11.965119530505 12.0% (14) | 4.6460585851433 4.6% (17) | 4.8046903648499 4.8% (32) | 8.4719528990205 8.5% (3) | 17.93075003187 17.9% (9) | 13.341225820233 13.3% (19) | 10.581853166024 10.6% (19) | 9.6060859436222 9.6% (30) | 3.3868026257272 3.4% (13) | - |
| Total AAV | 25735000 $25.7M (4) | 7126226 $7.1M (21) | 8681410 $8.7M (31) | 13946667 $13.9M (5) | 38645041 $38.6M (3) | 26244593 $26.2M (14) | 20587841 $20.6M (17) | 13565466 $13.6M (31) | 4697500 $4.7M (20) | 159229710 $159.2M (19) |
| Avg. Age | 3131.0 (3) | 2121.0 (16) | 24.77777777777824.8 (23) | 26.42857142857126.4 (12) | 26.11111111111126.1 (12) | 25.45454545454525.5 (19) | 26.726.7 (7) | 25.47058823529425.5 (15) | 25.66666666666725.7 (30) | 26.10810810810826.1 (5) |
New York Giants
Top 51 Cap Space: $8,093,719 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: OT, RB, TE, QB
The Giants have poured a strong amount of financial reinforcements into their defensive line/backfield (47% of their active cap) over the past two offseasons. This leaves the offensive side of the ball a bit light, notably Tight End (2.3%, 29th), Offensive Line (13.8%, 25th). Both should be high draft selections.
The Giants have poured a strong amount of financial reinforcements into their defensive line/backfield (47% of their active cap) over the past two offseasons. This leaves the offensive side of the ball a bit light, notably Tight End (2.3%, 29th), Offensive Line (13.8%, 25th). Both should be high draft selections.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 44 | 77 | 88 | 44 | 1212 | 1010 | 1111 | 1212 | 33 | 7171 |
| Cap Hits | 22342500 $22.3M (9) | 8263555 $8.3M (14) | 14747018 $14.7M (21) | 3905713 $3.9M (29) | 23305795 $23.3M (25) | 39568094 $39.6M (4) | 16755359 $16.8M (20) | 34122652 $34.1M (8) | 3565000 $3.6M (24) | 166575686 $166.6M (7) |
| % of Cap | 13.263740169204 13.3% (9) | 4.9057019757829 4.9% (14) | 8.7546431698592 8.8% (21) | 2.3186466334333 2.3% (29) | 13.835605206075 13.8% (25) | 23.489802743948 23.5% (4) | 9.9469051456972 9.9% (20) | 20.257088061416 20.3% (8) | 2.1163806066113 2.1% (24) | - |
| Total AAV | 23760000 $23.8M (9) | 8529804 $8.5M (15) | 15403860 $15.4M (22) | 6200714 $6.2M (24) | 17412473 $17.4M (29) | 47283028 $47.3M (1) | 14061692 $14.1M (26) | 30132919 $30.1M (14) | 3817500 $3.8M (25) | 166601990 $166.6M (13) |
| Avg. Age | 29.529.5 (6) | 25.71428571428625.7 (2) | 2626.0 (6) | 25.2525.3 (24) | 25.58333333333325.6 (23) | 25.225.2 (23) | 2626.0 (11) | 24.83333333333324.8 (28) | 26.66666666666726.7 (23) | 25.77464788732425.8 (19) |
New York Jets
Top 51 Cap Space: $14,319,679 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: OL, QB, CB, LB
24% (3rd most) of the Jets current active cap is allocated to their defensive line (for now), making for many underpaid positions. In terms of cap spending, the Jets are in need of a long-term linebacker, shut-down corner, franchise QB, and spread-offense versatile tight end.
24% (3rd most) of the Jets current active cap is allocated to their defensive line (for now), making for many underpaid positions. In terms of cap spending, the Jets are in need of a long-term linebacker, shut-down corner, franchise QB, and spread-offense versatile tight end.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 66 | 1111 | 55 | 1212 | 1313 | 1111 | 1414 | 66 | 8181 |
| Cap Hits | 8312583 $8.3M (25) | 11568333 $11.6M (3) | 15634888 $15.6M (20) | 3221582 $3.2M (31) | 31306387 $31.3M (7) | 40234396 $40.2M (3) | 14920585 $14.9M (24) | 30392497 $30.4M (14) | 3548948 $3.5M (25) | 159140199 $159.1M (15) |
| % of Cap | 4.9348077004339 4.9% (25) | 6.86760045218 6.9% (3) | 9.281731767108 9.3% (20) | 1.912508742611 1.9% (31) | 18.58519784288 18.6% (7) | 23.885356357116 23.9% (3) | 8.8576821131264 8.9% (24) | 18.042662338652 18.0% (14) | 2.1068512541576 2.1% (25) | - |
| Total AAV | 7873500 $7.9M (28) | 9742357 $9.7M (9) | 14124368 $14.1M (23) | 3398730 $3.4M (31) | 32195138 $32.2M (11) | 33164217 $33.2M (7) | 16177564 $16.2M (23) | 26655652 $26.7M (19) | 4013949 $4.0M (24) | 147345451 $147.3M (27) |
| Avg. Age | 2828.0 (13) | 21.521.5 (12) | 2525.0 (18) | 23.823.8 (30) | 25.83333333333325.8 (18) | 25.15384615384625.2 (24) | 25.36363636363625.4 (20) | 25.525.5 (14) | 25.66666666666725.7 (31) | 25.40740740740725.4 (25) |
Oakland Raiders
Top 51 Cap Space: $31,607,640 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: CB, LB, RB, OLB
For now the Raiders have just 1.8% of their active salary cap allocated to QBs (29th in the NFL). That is likely to change before summer's end. Oakland has spent multiple offseasons pumping money into the offensive line, and has been rewarded for doing so. Elsewhere Oakland's linebacker core ($11M, 6.5%) is 30th in the league in terms of cap spending, and the loss of Latavius Murray leaves the running back arsenal ($4M, 2.4%) at 29th.
For now the Raiders have just 1.8% of their active salary cap allocated to QBs (29th in the NFL). That is likely to change before summer's end. Oakland has spent multiple offseasons pumping money into the offensive line, and has been rewarded for doing so. Elsewhere Oakland's linebacker core ($11M, 6.5%) is 30th in the league in terms of cap spending, and the loss of Latavius Murray leaves the running back arsenal ($4M, 2.4%) at 29th.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 44 | 77 | 66 | 1111 | 1111 | 88 | 1010 | 44 | 6464 |
| Cap Hits | 3044182 $3.0M (29) | 4087298 $4.1M (29) | 20867516 $20.9M (11) | 10904272 $10.9M (9) | 40529218 $40.5M (3) | 15894976 $15.9M (26) | 11070131 $11.1M (30) | 31417067 $31.4M (12) | 8195000 $8.2M (4) | 146009660 $146.0M (27) |
| % of Cap | 1.8071943191572 1.8% (29) | 2.4264455036862 2.4% (29) | 12.388108322735 12.4% (11) | 6.4733772202005 6.5% (9) | 24.06037895549 24.1% (3) | 9.4361343475322 9.4% (26) | 6.5718402695783 6.6% (30) | 18.650903594785 18.7% (12) | 4.865003947035 4.9% (4) | - |
| Total AAV | 2882923 $2.9M (30) | 4643994 $4.6M (27) | 20457446 $20.5M (14) | 10978030 $11.0M (11) | 37827572 $37.8M (4) | 13360821 $13.4M (29) | 18980132 $19.0M (18) | 28497666 $28.5M (17) | 8695000 $8.7M (1) | 146323556 $146.3M (28) |
| Avg. Age | 25.66666666666725.7 (26) | 18.7518.8 (27) | 24.71428571428624.7 (24) | 26.66666666666726.7 (9) | 26.18181818181826.2 (8) | 24.36363636363624.4 (31) | 25.62525.6 (16) | 2626.0 (9) | 3232.0 (1) | 25.9687526.0 (12) |
Philadelphia Eagles
Top 51 Cap Space: $2,451,381 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: CB, RB, WR, DT
Outside of an offensive line that ranks 2nd in terms of cap spending ($45M, 27% of active cap), the Eagles are basically average across the board. The removal of Sam Bradford and Chase Daniel from the active cap has dropped their QB spending to 4.5% (27th in the NFL). Look for Philly to bolster the WR and DT positions early in the draft, as the current core has plenty of expiring contracts after 2017.
Outside of an offensive line that ranks 2nd in terms of cap spending ($45M, 27% of active cap), the Eagles are basically average across the board. The removal of Sam Bradford and Chase Daniel from the active cap has dropped their QB spending to 4.5% (27th in the NFL). Look for Philly to bolster the WR and DT positions early in the draft, as the current core has plenty of expiring contracts after 2017.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 66 | 1212 | 44 | 1616 | 1010 | 99 | 1212 | 44 | 7676 |
| Cap Hits | 7662804 $7.7M (27) | 11071144 $11.1M (4) | 25142651 $25.1M (6) | 8103333 $8.1M (20) | 45870830 $45.9M (2) | 24622103 $24.6M (15) | 24487748 $24.5M (11) | 20832964 $20.8M (26) | 3927500 $3.9M (23) | 171721077 $171.7M (3) |
| % of Cap | 4.5490630512941 4.5% (27) | 6.5724416422444 6.6% (4) | 14.926064228667 14.9% (6) | 4.8105853604806 4.8% (20) | 27.231454423889 27.2% (2) | 14.617038228103 14.6% (15) | 14.537277690543 14.5% (11) | 12.367596350023 12.4% (26) | 2.3315805981672 2.3% (23) | - |
| Total AAV | 12169085 $12.2M (22) | 10402836 $10.4M (6) | 25308560 $25.3M (4) | 13961666 $14.0M (4) | 47403662 $47.4M (2) | 33235450 $33.2M (6) | 22543078 $22.5M (14) | 25299141 $25.3M (21) | 4361666 $4.4M (22) | 194685120 $194.7M (1) |
| Avg. Age | 26.33333333333326.3 (23) | 21.83333333333321.8 (11) | 24.16666666666724.2 (29) | 26.526.5 (11) | 26.7526.8 (2) | 25.325.3 (20) | 25.22222222222225.2 (23) | 26.526.5 (3) | 30.7530.8 (2) | 26.03947368421126.0 (10) |
Pittsburgh Steelers
Top 51 Cap Space: $15,115,697 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: LB, CB, WR, QB
The Steelers might be on the verge of having their current window of success close in front of them. They certainly need to get younger and at the linebacker position and deeper at both the wide receiver and defensive back positions this spring. Le'Veon Bell's franchise tag has the running back core accounting for nearly 10% of the Steelers' active cap (1st in the NFL), while a croweded offensive line accounts for $38M (23%, 5th).
The Steelers might be on the verge of having their current window of success close in front of them. They certainly need to get younger and at the linebacker position and deeper at both the wide receiver and defensive back positions this spring. Le'Veon Bell's franchise tag has the running back core accounting for nearly 10% of the Steelers' active cap (1st in the NFL), while a croweded offensive line accounts for $38M (23%, 5th).
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 88 | 1111 | 55 | 1212 | 1313 | 99 | 1515 | 55 | 8181 |
| Cap Hits | 21090000 $21.1M (13) | 15975000 $16.0M (1) | 19573683 $19.6M (16) | 8877228 $8.9M (14) | 38485788 $38.5M (5) | 19808858 $19.8M (22) | 15204286 $15.2M (22) | 23264732 $23.3M (22) | 2930000 $2.9M (29) | 165209575 $165.2M (8) |
| % of Cap | 12.520187094932 12.5% (13) | 9.4836410071854 9.5% (1) | 11.620017700184 11.6% (16) | 5.2700121121085 5.3% (14) | 22.847286214125 22.8% (5) | 11.759630549879 11.8% (22) | 9.0261026725868 9.0% (22) | 13.811227944687 13.8% (22) | 1.7394095869204 1.7% (29) | - |
| Total AAV | 24636279 $24.6M (7) | 16135025 $16.1M (1) | 23548685 $23.5M (6) | 7652228 $7.7M (21) | 33659947 $33.7M (9) | 19391496 $19.4M (25) | 13166470 $13.2M (28) | 20206748 $20.2M (27) | 3270000 $3.3M (28) | 161666853 $161.7M (15) |
| Avg. Age | 29.33333333333329.3 (7) | 21.37521.4 (13) | 25.09090909090925.1 (15) | 24.824.8 (27) | 23.83333333333323.8 (32) | 24.84615384615424.8 (28) | 27.11111111111127.1 (2) | 25.33333333333325.3 (19) | 26.626.6 (26) | 25.30864197530925.3 (27) |
Seattle Seahawks
Top 51 Cap Space: $9,758,815 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: OL, CB, LB/Pass Rush
A look at their spending graph above makes it pretty clear where the Seahawks focus will be next week. At $15M (9%) Seattle boasts the cheapest offensive line spending in the NFL currently. The same can't be said for the defensive backfield, where their $44.5M (26%) in cap ranks 1st in the league. The Seahawks also boast the youngest roster on average, and the 5th highest active roster salary cap.
A look at their spending graph above makes it pretty clear where the Seahawks focus will be next week. At $15M (9%) Seattle boasts the cheapest offensive line spending in the NFL currently. The same can't be said for the defensive backfield, where their $44.5M (26%) in cap ranks 1st in the league. The Seahawks also boast the youngest roster on average, and the 5th highest active roster salary cap.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 22 | 1111 | 1010 | 66 | 1111 | 1313 | 77 | 1313 | 55 | 7878 |
| Cap Hits | 19345000 $19.3M (15) | 8596712 $8.6M (12) | 19014558 $19.0M (17) | 13921220 $13.9M (4) | 15344233 $15.3M (32) | 27048928 $27.0M (14) | 18661413 $18.7M (17) | 44495369 $44.5M (1) | 4245000 $4.2M (21) | 170672433 $170.7M (5) |
| % of Cap | 11.484258859718 11.5% (15) | 5.1034823442981 5.1% (12) | 11.288090264933 11.3% (17) | 8.2644039350265 8.3% (4) | 9.1091829297406 9.1% (32) | 16.057735385365 16.1% (14) | 11.078443917297 11.1% (17) | 26.414904918826 26.4% (1) | 2.5200661080126 2.5% (21) | - |
| Total AAV | 22445000 $22.4M (11) | 9249236 $9.2M (13) | 20977897 $21.0M (13) | 14034220 $14.0M (3) | 16028876 $16.0M (32) | 27596484 $27.6M (11) | 21901413 $21.9M (15) | 45905502 $45.9M (1) | 5145000 $5.1M (15) | 183283604 $183.3M (4) |
| Avg. Age | 25.525.5 (27) | 1919.0 (24) | 24.824.8 (21) | 25.66666666666725.7 (19) | 24.09090909090924.1 (31) | 25.76923076923125.8 (14) | 26.14285714285726.1 (10) | 26.69230769230826.7 (2) | 26.826.8 (22) | 2525.0 (31) |
San Francisco 49ers
Top 51 Cap Space: $70,213,476 | Draft Picks: 10 | Potential Draft Needs: Pass Rush, QB, WR, LB, etc ALL
The 49ers current roster embodies the epitome of a rebuild. Their active salary cap ($133M) is the lowest in the NFL, and their spending ranks lower than 15th in 8 of the 9 position groups. Their draft board next week should simply say "Best Available".
The 49ers current roster embodies the epitome of a rebuild. Their active salary cap ($133M) is the lowest in the NFL, and their spending ranks lower than 15th in 8 of the 9 position groups. Their draft board next week should simply say "Best Available".
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 22 | 66 | 1212 | 44 | 99 | 1111 | 1111 | 1313 | 55 | 7373 |
| Cap Hits | 7193750 $7.2M (28) | 7990638 $8.0M (15) | 18167862 $18.2M (18) | 8478783 $8.5M (18) | 24102575 $24.1M (21) | 19364521 $19.4M (23) | 26886092 $26.9M (8) | 16210262 $16.2M (29) | 4493550 $4.5M (18) | 132888033 $132.9M (32) |
| % of Cap | 4.270606728979 4.3% (28) | 4.7436833934506 4.7% (15) | 10.785444824794 10.8% (18) | 5.0334731862176 5.0% (18) | 14.308617755791 14.3% (21) | 11.495847601884 11.5% (23) | 15.961066955503 16.0% (8) | 9.6233055048775 9.6% (29) | 2.6676190953263 2.7% (18) | - |
| Total AAV | 8000000 $8.0M (27) | 9309640 $9.3M (12) | 21823696 $21.8M (9) | 10796283 $10.8M (12) | 22794455 $22.8M (26) | 21696175 $21.7M (18) | 30362426 $30.4M (7) | 11857682 $11.9M (32) | 4658550 $4.7M (21) | 141298882 $141.3M (31) |
| Avg. Age | 28.528.5 (12) | 2222.0 (10) | 25.7525.8 (8) | 27.2527.3 (3) | 26.55555555555626.6 (4) | 25.27272727272725.3 (22) | 26.45454545454526.5 (9) | 24.61538461538524.6 (31) | 2727.0 (21) | 25.95890410958926.0 (14) |
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Top 51 Cap Space: $28,718,332 | Draft Picks: 7 | Potential Draft Needs: S, TE, RB
The Bucs made a few smaller free agent signings to bolster their secondary, but are expected to look for a long-term solution via the draft. Doug Martin (suspended, PEDs) leaves the RB position a bit up in the air, while the Bucs 6 linebackers account for just $9M (5.3%), cheapest in the league. Conversely, Tampa Bay's defensive line has $43M (25.6%) allocated to it, the most in the NFL.
The Bucs made a few smaller free agent signings to bolster their secondary, but are expected to look for a long-term solution via the draft. Doug Martin (suspended, PEDs) leaves the RB position a bit up in the air, while the Bucs 6 linebackers account for just $9M (5.3%), cheapest in the league. Conversely, Tampa Bay's defensive line has $43M (25.6%) allocated to it, the most in the NFL.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 88 | 88 | 55 | 1414 | 1212 | 66 | 1111 | 55 | 7272 |
| Cap Hits | 9345985 $9.3M (24) | 11039729 $11.0M (5) | 20685478 $20.7M (12) | 3860000 $3.9M (30) | 24118391 $24.1M (20) | 43213886 $43.2M (1) | 9005756 $9.0M (32) | 24360235 $24.4M (19) | 7801038 $7.8M (5) | 153430498 $153.4M (22) |
| % of Cap | 5.5482921188444 5.5% (24) | 6.5537919657348 6.6% (5) | 12.2800405267 12.3% (12) | 2.2915088756016 2.3% (30) | 14.318007005629 14.3% (20) | 25.654145937367 25.7% (1) | 5.3463134211146 5.3% (32) | 14.461578941513 14.5% (19) | 4.6311263771775 4.6% (5) | - |
| Total AAV | 8769819 $8.8M (25) | 12275879 $12.3M (4) | 18242043 $18.2M (16) | 3805000 $3.8M (29) | 23795200 $23.8M (23) | 44521075 $44.5M (2) | 13175758 $13.2M (27) | 22357455 $22.4M (23) | 7668142 $7.7M (5) | 154610322 $154.6M (22) |
| Avg. Age | 25.33333333333325.3 (28) | 18.87518.9 (25) | 24.87524.9 (20) | 2525.0 (26) | 25.71428571428625.7 (20) | 26.7526.8 (4) | 24.33333333333324.3 (32) | 25.72727272727325.7 (12) | 2828.0 (16) | 25.69444444444425.7 (20) |
Tennessee Titans
Top 51 Cap Space: $47,615,885 | Draft Picks: 8 | Potential Draft Needs: WR, CB, LB
It's expected that the Titans will take the first WR off the board next week to help bolster an offensive on the rise. Tennessee has done well to fill holes on that side of the ball while keeping their costs at an "average" rate, with the exception of an offensive line that combines 11 players at just $18.4M (11%) - 3rd cheapest in the NFL. Expect Tennessee to address an aging linebacker core through the draft as well.
It's expected that the Titans will take the first WR off the board next week to help bolster an offensive on the rise. Tennessee has done well to fill holes on that side of the ball while keeping their costs at an "average" rate, with the exception of an offensive line that combines 11 players at just $18.4M (11%) - 3rd cheapest in the NFL. Expect Tennessee to address an aging linebacker core through the draft as well.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 44 | 77 | 55 | 1111 | 1111 | 99 | 1313 | 33 | 6666 |
| Cap Hits | 9893811 $9.9M (23) | 9468503 $9.5M (9) | 12295388 $12.3M (27) | 8528116 $8.5M (17) | 18482608 $18.5M (30) | 23637283 $23.6M (17) | 27423070 $27.4M (6) | 28599043 $28.6M (15) | 7284668 $7.3M (7) | 145612490 $145.6M (28) |
| % of Cap | 5.873511844566 5.9% (23) | 5.6210255604042 5.6% (9) | 7.2992203966231 7.3% (27) | 5.0627599756891 5.1% (17) | 10.972295408359 11.0% (30) | 14.032394764147 14.0% (17) | 16.279846710167 16.3% (6) | 16.977969136842 17.0% (15) | 4.3245806678267 4.3% (7) | - |
| Total AAV | 9158494 $9.2M (24) | 8953937 $9.0M (14) | 12278721 $12.3M (28) | 10355748 $10.4M (14) | 17410852 $17.4M (30) | 23928721 $23.9M (17) | 23425655 $23.4M (11) | 31615619 $31.6M (10) | 6550000 $6.6M (10) | 143677721 $143.7M (29) |
| Avg. Age | 28.66666666666728.7 (11) | 1919.0 (23) | 26.14285714285726.1 (4) | 26.626.6 (10) | 25.18181818181825.2 (25) | 25.54545454545525.5 (18) | 2727.0 (4) | 25.15384615384625.2 (20) | 29.33333333333329.3 (10) | 26.06060606060626.1 (9) |
Washington Redskins
Top 51 Cap Space: $8,118,703 | Draft Picks: 10 | Potential Draft Needs: DL, DB, OL, RB
An already bad defensive line lost its best player (Chris Baker) to free agency, leaving the Redskins little choice at the top of the draft this year. A slightly overpriced offensive line as 3 of 5 starters entering contract years, while the Redskins have pumped volume into their linebackers and secondary, might should be looking to get younger and cheaper in both cases. Their nearly $171M in active roster cap ranks 4th in the league currently.
An already bad defensive line lost its best player (Chris Baker) to free agency, leaving the Redskins little choice at the top of the draft this year. A slightly overpriced offensive line as 3 of 5 starters entering contract years, while the Redskins have pumped volume into their linebackers and secondary, might should be looking to get younger and cheaper in both cases. Their nearly $171M in active roster cap ranks 4th in the league currently.
| QB | RB/FB | WR | TE | OL | DL | LB | DB | ST | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Players | 33 | 55 | 1111 | 55 | 1111 | 88 | 1616 | 1313 | 33 | 7575 |
| Cap Hits | 28117933 $28.1M (2) | 5096241 $5.1M (25) | 13564484 $13.6M (26) | 12769167 $12.8M (6) | 33290843 $33.3M (6) | 11075000 $11.1M (31) | 26940161 $26.9M (7) | 36833477 $36.8M (4) | 3242500 $3.2M (28) | 170929806 $170.9M (4) |
| % of Cap | 16.692355708049 16.7% (2) | 3.0254097108043 3.0% (25) | 8.0526257717502 8.1% (26) | 7.5804817395179 7.6% (6) | 19.763280365482 19.8% (6) | 6.5747307764994 6.6% (31) | 15.993165295761 16.0% (7) | 21.866383281028 21.9% (4) | 1.9249268210203 1.9% (28) | - |
| Total AAV | 27562934 $27.6M (2) | 5120242 $5.1M (26) | 13802887 $13.8M (25) | 17855000 $17.9M (2) | 28228422 $28.2M (18) | 14700000 $14.7M (27) | 25572183 $25.6M (9) | 31072598 $31.1M (11) | 3217000 $3.2M (29) | 167131266 $167.1M (11) |
| Avg. Age | 2727.0 (17) | 24.424.4 (4) | 25.18181818181825.2 (14) | 2727.0 (8) | 26.18181818181826.2 (9) | 26.2526.3 (7) | 25.937525.9 (12) | 26.07692307692326.1 (6) | 27.33333333333327.3 (19) | 25.98666666666726.0 (11) |
